What The craft of writing asks of you in the 2024 English syllabuses
“Students develop control of their own imaginative, discursive, persuasive and reflective writing, and show it in a timed response that no longer depends on prescribed texts”
The craft of writing asks English Advanced and Standard students to produce controlled imaginative, discursive, persuasive and/or reflective writing, and from the 2027 HSC it has no prescribed texts and no requirement to reflect on them. It is assessed in Paper 2 Section III for 20 marks, can be set in two parts, and rewards voice, form chosen for a reason, careful drafting and an ending that has been planned.
Jump to a section
New 2024 syllabus (first HSC 2027). This page follows the English Advanced and English Standard 11-12 (2024) syllabuses. If you are sitting the 2026 HSC, use the older Module C: The Craft of Writing pages instead.
What this focus area is asking
The craft of writing asks you to write well. Not about writing, and not about someone else's writing, but your own pieces, shaped by choices you can explain. Over the focus area you develop the skill of controlling voice, form, structure and language for a specific audience and purpose, and you refine pieces through drafting and editing.
The biggest change from the 2017 course is that there are no prescribed texts. You will still read widely, because writers learn from other writers, but your teacher can choose models freely, and the exam question does not require you to use texts you studied.
What changed in 2024
| Feature | 2017 Module C (to the 2026 HSC) | 2024 focus area (from the 2027 HSC) |
|---|---|---|
| Prescribed texts | At least two short prescribed texts | None |
| Reflection on texts in the exam | The question could require you to reflect on one or more of your prescribed texts | The question does not require you to draw on prescribed texts |
| Types of writing listed (Advanced and Standard) | Imaginative, discursive, persuasive, informative or reflective | Imaginative, discursive, persuasive and/or reflective |
NESA's HSC examinations pages list the same four types for both courses: imaginative, discursive, persuasive and/or reflective. Both changes apply to English Advanced and English Standard: the 2017 list of types included "informative", which is gone, and the question no longer asks you to reflect on prescribed texts.
Where it sits in the course
- It is a Year 12 focus area of about 30 of the 120 indicative hours for both courses.
- It replaces Module C (Advanced and Standard).
- It is assessed in Paper 2, Section III, worth 20 marks. The question may come in two parts. Paper 2 is 2 hours plus 5 minutes of reading time with three 20-mark sections.
- In school assessment, NESA's sample program has a task assessing The craft of writing weighted 20% to 30%.
What the question may look like
NESA's specification says the question asks for an imaginative, discursive, persuasive and/or reflective response and may be in two parts. It may offer a stimulus or an idea and ask you to compose in a form you choose. Treat this as an invitation to show control rather than as a test of one form.
What a strong student does
- Reads like a writer. Each week, notice how a favourite piece starts, how it controls pace, and how it ends. Borrow methods, not sentences.
- Drafts and edits for real. Marks reward control, and control comes from revision. Practise cutting a first draft by a fifth.
- Develops a voice. Voice is consistent choices about diction, rhythm and perspective. Practise writing in different voices and then choosing one.
- Chooses form for a reason. A letter, a monologue, a speech or a story each shape what you can say.
- Plans an ending early. Strong pieces know where they are going. Even a loose ending in mind helps.
- Writes under time pressure. Practise 40-minute pieces so that the exam feels familiar.
If your syllabus asks for a reflection
Reflection has not disappeared; it has changed target. The exam question does not ask you to reflect on prescribed texts, but it may be set in two parts, and the second part can ask you to evaluate your own language choices. NESA's Advanced sample paper does exactly this, with a 10-mark composition followed by a 10-mark evaluation of how you used language in it. The Standard sample paper instead used a single reflective piece based on a stimulus. Answer reflective parts in plain, precise prose: what you intended, which choices you made, and how well they worked. Both shapes appear in the practice questions on this page.
Common traps
- Memorising a story and bending it to fit any prompt.
- Explaining meaning at the end of a story.
- Overusing adjectives instead of precise nouns and verbs.
- Writing in a voice that changes by accident.
- Running out of time before the ending.
Check yourself
You should be able to:
- name the four types of writing in the Advanced question;
- say what has changed about prescribed texts and reflection;
- describe where The craft of writing sits in Paper 2 and what it is worth;
- describe one writing habit you will practise each week.
Practice questions
Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.
foundation3 marksName the four kinds of writing the Advanced question can ask for in The craft of writing, and give a one-line description of each in your own words.Show worked solution →
Model answer.
- Imaginative: invented worlds, characters or moments (stories, scenes, monologues).
- Discursive: thoughtful exploration of an idea, often reflective in tone, such as an essay or personal essay.
- Persuasive: writing designed to move a reader to a view or action, such as a speech or editorial.
- Reflective: writing that looks back on or thinks about experience and its meaning.
Marking spine.
- 1 mark: three or four types named correctly.
- 1 mark: accurate descriptions.
- 1 mark: clear, plain expression.
Note. The 2017 Advanced specification also listed 'informative'. The new Advanced and Standard specifications list imaginative, discursive, persuasive and/or reflective.
foundation4 marksRewrite this flat sentence from a short story so it shows rather than tells. 'Dev was nervous before the interview.' Write two or three sentences.Show worked solution →
Model answer. 'Dev folded his résumé into a smaller and smaller square. The waiting room clock had a tick he could feel in his teeth. When his name was called, he stood too quickly and had to steady himself against the chair.'
Marking spine.
- 1 mark: nervousness is not named directly.
- 2 marks: concrete detail and action carry the feeling (the folding, the clock, the unsteady standing).
- 1 mark: controlled, varied sentences.
core6 marksA student's persuasive speech opens: 'Today I am going to talk about why phones should be banned in schools.' Explain in 3 or 4 sentences why this opening is weak, then write a stronger opening of two or three sentences.Show worked solution →
Model answer. The opening announces the topic instead of engaging the audience, so it wastes the most attentive moment of the speech. A stronger opening starts with something that creates interest or tension. For example: 'Every classroom in this school has twenty-five students and twenty-five screens, and the screens are winning. If we do not decide who is in charge, they will decide for us.'
Marking spine. 2 marks for explaining the weakness (announcing, not engaging); 2 for a stronger opening with a hook; 2 for a clear audience, voice and stance in the new opening.
core8 marksWrite a reflective paragraph (about 120 words) about a time you changed your mind, but without using the phrases 'I learned' or 'I realised'. Aim for specific detail and a thoughtful ending.Show worked solution →
Model paragraph. 'For two years I told people I hated the beach. The sand got into everything and the sun made me feel like a piece of toast. Then last summer my grandfather asked me to walk the length of Bondi at dawn, and I went only because he had walked slower each year. The sand was cold. The gulls had the place to themselves. By the time we reached the rocks I had stopped checking my phone, and it did not seem to matter that I had stopped. It was not the beach I had changed my mind about.'
Marking spine. 2 marks for specific, concrete detail; 2 for voice and control of tone; 2 for avoiding the banned phrases while still showing change; 2 for a closing idea that is implied, not announced.
exam20 marksWrite a piece of imaginative, discursive, persuasive or reflective writing (your choice of form) that explores the idea of a threshold. Your response may be fiction, nonfiction or a hybrid. No reference to any prescribed text is required.Show worked solution →
How a strong response is shaped.
- Decide the form and why. A short story, a reflective essay, a speech or a hybrid. Choose the form in which you can show control quickly, and keep it consistent.
- Treat 'threshold' flexibly. It can be a doorway, an age, a decision, a border, a moment before something changes. Original, specific interpretations outscore predictable ones.
- Open with a moment, not a summary. Begin close to the turning point.
- Control voice. Choose a narrator or speaker and keep the register consistent unless a change is deliberate.
- Use craft choices on purpose. Imagery, structure (for example, a repeated phrase or a shifting timeline), sentence rhythm, and a precise ending.
- Edit. Leave five minutes to cut padding and check for clichés.
Model excerpt (opening of an original short story, about 170 words).
The ferry doors stayed shut for eleven seconds longer than usual, and in those seconds Mira decided not to get off. Everyone else shuffled forward anyway, a slow tide of backpacks and umbrellas, and she let it pass around her like water around a rock. On the wharf her mother would be standing with the car keys, rehearsing the speech about the new school, the new house, the new beginning that she had been promising all summer.
Mira studied the strip of grey harbour through the gap in the doors. It looked no different from the harbour she had crossed that morning, but she had the strange feeling that it had been quietly rearranged while she wasn't watching. The seat beside her still held the shape of a stranger who had left. She put her palm in the hollow. It was warm, and that was somehow the worst part: a whole life, and then a warmth, and then nothing.
The doors opened. She stood.
Why it works: it opens on a moment, not a summary; the voice is steady; the threshold is a doorway, a decision and a change of life at once, and the final short sentences leave the choice unexplained.
Marking spine (20). About 7 for ideas and originality of treatment; 7 for control of language, voice, and form; 3 for structure and cohesion; 3 for accuracy and polish. Pieces that explain their own meaning outright, rely on stock plots, or run out of time before the ending are usually held in the middle bands.
exam20 marksRead this original stimulus. 'The last train had gone, and the platform lights buzzed over nobody. She counted the coins in her palm twice, as though the number might change its mind.' (a) Carry this scene forward in the form you choose (imaginative, discursive or persuasive), shaping it so that the reader feels one emotion you have decided on. (10 marks) (b) Name that emotion, then explain which of your language choices in part (a) create it and judge how well they work. (10 marks)Show worked solution →
What this tests. NESA's specification says The craft of writing may be set in two parts, and the Advanced sample paper has exactly this shape: a 10-mark composition followed by a 10-mark evaluation of your own language choices. The two parts are linked, so choose an emotion in part (a) that you can explain in part (b).
Part (a): plan (about 20 minutes).
- Decide the emotion before you write (quiet dread, relief, tenderness, shame) and the form (a scene continuing in the same voice is fastest).
- Keep the stimulus's close, precise voice. Continue from the moment rather than summarising what came before.
- Choose two or three devices to use on purpose (a repeated object, a shift in sentence length, a concrete sensory detail) so that part (b) has something real to evaluate.
- Part (a): model continuation (about 110 words)
- The number stayed the same. Four dollars and thirty cents, and the vending machine across the tracks hummed as if it knew. She tried the phone again. Her mother's name sat on the screen like a held breath, and she did not press it, because pressing it meant saying where she was, and saying where she was meant saying why. A gust pushed an empty chip packet along the yellow line. She watched it all the way to the end of the platform, then looked back at the coins, and for the first time since the train left she let herself count them slowly, as if slowness could make them enough.
- Part (b): model paragraph (about 120 words)
- I wanted the reader to feel a quiet, protective ache for a girl who is too proud to ask for help. I opened by repeating the counting of the coins, which echoes the stimulus and makes the reader share her small, hopeless arithmetic. The simile of the mother's name as 'a held breath' turns the phone into a source of tension, so the reader is made to wait with her. Short declarative sentences ('The number stayed the same') produce a flat, defeated rhythm, while the final long sentence slows her counting down, and the phrase 'as if slowness could make them enough' lets the reader see her hope without my stating it. Withholding the reason for her situation was deliberate: it keeps the emotion focused on her dignity.
- Marking spine (20)
- Part (a), 10 marks: about 4 for ideas and effect on the reader; 4 for control of language, voice and form; 2 for structure and accuracy. Part (b), 10 marks: about 4 for a clear statement of the intended emotional response; 4 for specific evaluation of language choices quoted from your own piece (what each does and how well it works); 2 for clear, controlled expression. A part (b) that only lists techniques, or that praises the piece without pointing to its words, stays in the middle bands. The Standard sample paper instead used a single reflective piece based on a stimulus, so practise both shapes.
Practise this
Sources & how we know this
- English Advanced 11-12 Syllabus (2024): course overview, requirements and implementation — NESA (2024)
- English Advanced 11-12 Syllabus (2024): HSC examinations — NESA (2026)
- English Standard 11-12 Syllabus (2024): course overview, requirements and implementation — NESA (2024)
- English Standard 11-12 Syllabus (2024): HSC examinations — NESA (2026)
- English Advanced 11-12 Syllabus (2024): Year 12 prescribed texts (checked 7 October 2026) — NESA (2026)
- HSC English prescriptions (NESA, checked 7 October 2026) — NESA (2026)
- English Standard 11-12 Syllabus (2024): Year 12 prescribed texts (checked 7 October 2026) — NESA (2026)
- English Advanced Stage 6 Syllabus (2017) — NESA
- English Standard Stage 6 Syllabus (2017) — NESA
- English Advanced HSC exam papers — NESA
- English Standard HSC exam papers — NESA