How do the discourses a text draws on shape the way it represents the world?
Analyse how discourses and language choices in a text construct particular ways of thinking and speaking about the world
A focused answer to the WACE Year 12 Literature Unit 3 dot point on discourse. What a discourse is, how to spot the discourses a text draws on, and how to argue what they make seem natural.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
In WACE Literature, a discourse is more than a set of words. It is a shared way of thinking and talking about a subject that carries its own assumptions about what is true and what matters. There is a legal discourse, a romantic discourse, a religious discourse, a scientific discourse, a colonial discourse. Each comes with characteristic vocabulary, tone and logic, and each quietly smuggles in a view of the world.
When a text adopts a discourse, it borrows that discourse's assumptions. If a character describes a relationship using the discourse of commerce, with words such as investment, return and worth, the text is constructing love as a transaction whether or not it says so directly. Reading for discourse means hearing which language system a passage is speaking in, and asking what that system takes for granted.
Spotting a discourse
A discourse announces itself through clusters of related vocabulary and a recognisable logic. Look for fields of language that belong together: terms of measurement and diagnosis signal a clinical or medical discourse; terms of sin, grace and judgement signal a religious one; terms of territory, savagery and civilisation signal a colonial one. When several such terms gather in a passage, the text is operating inside that discourse, and the discourse is shaping what can be said.
Why the choice matters
The same situation described in different discourses becomes a different thing. Grief framed in a medical discourse becomes a condition to be managed; the same grief framed in a religious discourse becomes a trial to be endured; framed in a romantic discourse it becomes proof of the depth of love. None of these is the truth of grief. Each is a construction, and the discourse a text selects tells you what it wants grief to mean.
Competing discourses inside one text
Sophisticated texts set discourses against each other. A character may speak the discourse of duty while the narration undercuts it with the discourse of desire, and the friction between them is where the meaning lives. Tracking which discourse wins, which is mocked, and which the text gives the last word to is high-level analysis, because it shows the text taking a position through language alone.
The analysis names the two discourses, identifies their vocabulary, and then argues how the text tilts the contest through a craft choice (giving one side the only metaphor). The discourse is not decoration; it is the mechanism of the meaning.
Discourse and naturalisation
The power of a discourse is that it makes its assumptions feel obvious. When a text describes colonised land using the discourse of emptiness and wilderness, it naturalises the idea that the land was unowned and available. Part of your job is to denaturalise: to point out that the discourse is a construction and to name the alternative it suppresses. This connects discourse analysis directly to post-colonial and feminist reading, which often begin by exposing the discourse a text takes for granted.
Wording your claim
Name the discourse precisely and argue its effect. A text draws on, adopts, mobilises or is structured by a discourse. Saying a text "frames migration through a discourse of invasion, its vocabulary of floods, waves and swarming reducing people to a threatening natural force" is an argument about discourse; saying it "uses negative language about migration" is not.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SCSA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
WACE 202115 marksSection One (Response: Close Reading). Analyse how language choices in the unseen text construct a particular way of seeing its subject.Show worked answer →
A strong close reading of an unseen prose or poetry passage builds an interpretation, it does not list devices.
Plan in five minutes: read twice, fix the dominant discourse the passage draws on (for example a medical, legal, romantic or religious way of speaking), and frame a thesis about what that discourse makes seem natural.
Per paragraph, name the lexical choices and grammatical patterns (loaded nouns, agentless passives, modal verbs) and argue what each does to the reader's sense of the subject, then connect it back to the discourse.
Strong move: identify a moment where the discourse strains or competes with another, and argue what the friction reveals about the values at stake.
Markers reward an argued reading grounded in precise textual evidence, and penalise feature-spotting and paraphrase.
WACE 202320 marksSection Three (Comparative/Critical Essay). With reference to at least two texts you have studied, discuss how language and discourse construct competing ways of understanding the world.Show worked answer →
A 20 mark comparative essay needs a genuine line of argument across both texts, not parallel summaries.
Thesis: state the competing discourses your two texts mobilise and what is at stake when each is naturalised.
Structure by idea, not by text: each body paragraph should weigh both texts against one analytical point, moving between them rather than handling each in turn.
Embed close analysis: name specific language choices in each text and argue their effect, so the comparison rests on evidence not assertion.
Conclude by evaluating: which way of speaking does each text invite the reader to accept, and what does the comparison reveal about how language shapes belief.
Markers reward integrated comparison, a sustained thesis, precise evidence and conceptual control of "discourse".