VICAccountingSyllabus dot point

How do ethical considerations affect accounting decisions, and what are the consequences of manipulating reports by shifting revenues and expenses between periods?

Discussing and evaluating the ethical considerations in business decision-making, including the manipulation of profit by shifting revenues and expenses between reporting periods and the wider social and environmental responsibilities of a business

A focused VCE Accounting Unit 4 answer on ethical considerations. Explains how shifting revenues and expenses between periods manipulates profit, links it to the accrual basis and faithful representation, considers social and environmental responsibilities, and works an example showing the report distortion with reconciled figures.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.76 min answerUpdated 2026-05-29

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section

What this dot point is asking
Ethics in accounting
Manipulating profit by shifting periods
Worked example
Social and environmental responsibility
Why this matters

What this dot point is asking

VCAA wants you to discuss and evaluate ethical considerations in business decision-making, especially the manipulation of profit by shifting revenues and expenses between periods, and to consider a business's wider social and environmental responsibilities.

Ethics in accounting

Accounting information is trusted by banks, the owner and other users to make decisions, so distorting it to look better is unethical even where it is not strictly illegal.

Manipulating profit by shifting periods

The most examined ethical breach is deliberately recording revenues or expenses in the wrong period to alter reported profit:

Recording revenue before it is earned, or holding an invoice open past balance day, to inflate this year's profit.
Delaying recognition of an incurred expense, or omitting a balance day adjustment such as accrued wages, to inflate this year's profit.
Bringing expenses forward or pushing revenue back to reduce a profit, perhaps to lower tax or smooth results.

Worked example

The effect of delaying an expense

The situation

At 30 June a business has incurred but not paid wages of 5,000 dollars and has not received the June electricity bill of 800 dollars. Reported profit before adjustments is 60,000 dollars. The owner is tempted to omit both balance day adjustments so the figures look stronger for a loan application.

Ethical (correct) treatment

Record Accrued Wages 5,000 and Accrued Electricity 800. Adjusted profit = 60,000 minus 5,000 minus 800 = 54,200 dollars. The Balance Sheet shows accrued liabilities of 5,800.

Unethical (manipulated) treatment

Omitting both adjustments leaves profit at 60,000, overstating it by 5,800, and understates liabilities by the same 5,800. Next period those costs are paid, depressing that period's profit instead.

Evaluation

The manipulation makes one period look 5,800 better at the expense of the next, misleads the bank into a lending decision based on false figures, and risks the owner's reputation and the relationship with the lender if discovered. The faithful, ethical profit is 54,200.

Ethical decision-making extends beyond the reports. A business may face choices such as paying fair wages, sourcing inventory responsibly, managing waste, or being honest with customers, even where the ethical option costs more in the short term. Evaluating a decision means weighing the financial result against these wider responsibilities and the long term effect on reputation and stakeholder trust.

Why this matters

Discussion questions reward students who name the breached concept (accrual basis, faithful representation, period), explain who is misled and how, and weigh short term financial gain against longer term consequences. Ethics is examined alongside balance day adjustments, budgeting and report analysis.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of VCAA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

2021 VCAA5 marksThe owner of Ocean Cuttlefish wants the accountant to depreciate refrigeration equipment using a 15-year life, a $120 000 residual value and the straight-line method instead of reducing balance, saying it will make profit look much better so a potential buyer will be more interested. Discuss any ethical and accounting issues that the accountant should consider when determining the depreciation method, the estimates of useful life and the residual value for the equipment.

Show worked answer →

A 5-mark discussion needs the accounting issue, the ethical issue, the effect on users, and a balanced judgement.

Accounting: estimates of useful life and residual value, and the choice of method, should reflect the expected pattern of economic benefits, not a desired profit. Choosing a longer life and higher residual purely to lower depreciation overstates profit and the asset's carrying value, breaching faithful representation (and relevance).
Ethical: the owner's motive is to mislead a prospective buyer, so the accountant should act with integrity and objectivity and not select estimates designed to manipulate reported profit.
Effect on users: the buyer relies on the reports and could overpay, and the accountant's professional reputation and legal position are at risk.
Judgement: the accountant should base the method and estimates on genuine, justifiable expectations of the equipment's use, not on the owner's preference.

2019 VCAA5 marksHealth900's owner wants a higher profit before selling the business and, without changing the business model, switches from FIFO to Identified Cost and deliberately stacks the lowest-priced items at the front so they are sold first, hoping to report higher profit and asset values. Discuss any ethical issues that the owner should consider. Refer to one qualitative characteristic that may be breached as a result of inventory being stacked in this way.