Skip to main content
ExamExplained
TAS · Physics
Physics study scene
§-Syllabus dot point
TASPhysicsSyllabus dot point

How much energy does it take to move through a gravitational field?

Describe gravitational potential energy in a radial field and relate work done to changes in field energy.

Field lines around a mass, the radial gravitational potential energy formula, the area under a field-distance graph, and the work needed to move between points in a gravitational field.

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

What this dot point is asking

This dot point extends gravity from the uniform field near the surface to the full radial field around a planet or star, where field strength and potential energy depend on distance.

Field lines and the radial field

A gravitational field is represented by field lines that point toward the mass creating the field. Around a point mass or sphere the lines are radial, spreading out evenly in all directions. Where the lines are closer together the field is stronger, so the field is strongest near the surface and weakens with distance following the inverse-square law g=GMr2g = \dfrac{GM}{r^2}.

Near the surface, over distances small compared with the planet's radius, the lines are almost parallel and evenly spaced, which is why we treat the surface field as uniform and use g=9.8 N kg1g = 9.8\ \text{N kg}^{-1}.

Gravitational potential energy in a radial field

Close to the surface we use Ep=mghE_p = mgh, but this assumes constant gg. Over large distances gg changes, so the correct expression for the gravitational potential energy of a mass mm at distance rr from the centre of mass MM is:

Ep=GMmrE_p = -\frac{GMm}{r}

The energy is negative because the zero of potential energy is defined at infinite separation, where the masses no longer interact. As you move a mass closer, the energy becomes more negative; as you move it away, it rises toward zero. Bringing the masses together releases energy, which is why falling objects gain kinetic energy.

Work done moving through the field

The work needed to move a mass between two points equals the change in its gravitational potential energy:

W=ΔEp=GMm(1r21r1)W = \Delta E_p = -GMm\left(\frac{1}{r_2} - \frac{1}{r_1}\right)

Moving away from the planet (r2>r1r_2 > r_1) makes EpE_p less negative, so ΔEp\Delta E_p is positive and you must do work. Moving inward releases energy. This is the energy a rocket must supply to climb to a higher orbit.

Escape velocity

A particularly important application is the escape velocity, the minimum launch speed for an object to reach infinity with no kinetic energy left. Setting the kinetic energy at the surface equal to the energy needed to lift the object to zero potential energy gives 12mvesc2=GMmr\tfrac12 m v_\text{esc}^2 = \dfrac{GMm}{r}, so vesc=2GMrv_\text{esc} = \sqrt{\dfrac{2GM}{r}}. For Earth this is about 11 km s111\ \text{km s}^{-1}. Notice the mass of the projectile cancels, so the escape speed depends only on the planet, exactly as for orbital speed.

Field-distance graphs

If you plot gravitational field strength gg against distance rr, the area under the graph between two radii gives the change in gravitational potential per unit mass. Because the field follows an inverse-square curve, this area is found by integration or by counting squares, and it confirms that most of the energy to escape a planet is spent close to the surface where the field is strongest.

In the exam, check the scale of the height change. If it is small compared with the planet's radius, mghmgh is fine. If the object moves a large distance or out to space, switch to Ep=GMmrE_p = -\dfrac{GMm}{r} and work with the change in energy.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of TASC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

TCE 20224 marksComet Shoemaker-Levy 9 broke apart before crashing into Jupiter in 1994. Three parts A, B and C lie along the comet at different distances from Jupiter. Explain the relative sizes of Jupiter's gravitational field at A, B and C, and explain why the comet broke apart as it approached Jupiter.
Show worked answer →

Jupiter's gravitational field is radial and follows an inverse-square law, g=GMr2g = \dfrac{GM}{r^2}, so the field strength is larger the closer a point is to Jupiter.

The part nearest Jupiter experiences the strongest field (longest vector), the middle part an intermediate field, and the far part the weakest (shortest vector). The vectors also point slightly inward toward Jupiter's centre, not all parallel.

Because the near side is pulled much harder than the far side, there is a difference in pull across the comet's length (a tidal force) that stretches it along the line to Jupiter. When this differential pull exceeds the comet's own weak self-gravity and structural strength, the comet is torn apart into a string of fragments.

Markers reward linking the inverse-square field to each vector's size and identifying the differential (tidal) force as the cause of break-up.

TCE 20193 marksCavendish measured Earth's mass using the gravitational force FF between lead masses of 20 kg20\ \text{kg} and 50 kg50\ \text{kg} at various separations rr. State what should be plotted for a straight-line graph and outline how the universal gravitational constant is found from the gradient.
Show worked answer →

Newton's law of gravitation is F=Gm1m2r2F = \dfrac{Gm_1 m_2}{r^2}. This is not linear in rr, but it is linear in 1r2\dfrac{1}{r^2}.

Plotting FF (vertical) against 1r2\dfrac{1}{r^2} (horizontal) gives a straight line through the origin with gradient Gm1m2Gm_1 m_2.

Reading the gradient and dividing by the product of the masses gives GG:

G=gradientm1m2=gradient(20)(50)=gradient1000.G = \frac{\text{gradient}}{m_1 m_2} = \frac{\text{gradient}}{(20)(50)} = \frac{\text{gradient}}{1000}.

For example a gradient of about 6.7×108 N m26.7 \times 10^{-8}\ \text{N m}^2 gives G=6.7×1011 N m2kg2G = 6.7 \times 10^{-11}\ \text{N m}^2\,\text{kg}^{-2}. Markers want the linearising variable 1r2\dfrac{1}{r^2} and G=gradientm1m2G = \dfrac{\text{gradient}}{m_1 m_2}.

ExamExplained