Why do markets sometimes fail, and how can government intervention improve outcomes?
Explain the main sources of market failure and evaluate government policies used to correct them.
Externalities, public goods, information failure and market power as sources of market failure, plus taxes, subsidies, regulation and other government responses in Australia.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
A market fails when the free-market quantity differs from the quantity that maximises society's wellbeing. The main sources examined in TCE Economics are externalities, public goods, common access resources, information failure and market power.
Externalities
An externality is a cost or benefit that falls on a third party who is not part of the transaction.
- A negative externality (such as factory pollution) means the social cost is greater than the private cost. The market overproduces because producers ignore the cost imposed on others. On a diagram, the marginal social cost curve sits above the marginal private cost curve, and the efficient quantity is lower than the market quantity.
- A positive externality (such as vaccination or education) means the social benefit is greater than the private benefit. The market underproduces because buyers ignore the benefit to others.
The deadweight loss is the loss of welfare from producing the wrong quantity. Government policy aims to internalise the externality so that decision-makers face the full social cost or benefit.
Public goods
Public goods are non-excludable (you cannot stop non-payers using them) and non-rival (one person's use does not reduce another's). Examples include national defence and street lighting. Because of the free-rider problem, private firms cannot profitably supply them, so the market provides too little or none. Government usually provides public goods directly, funded by taxation.
Common access resources
Common access resources, such as fish stocks or clean air, are rival but non-excludable. Without rules they tend to be over-used, an outcome often called the tragedy of the commons. Australian examples include managed fisheries, where the government sets catch quotas to prevent depletion.
Information failure and market power
- Asymmetric information occurs when one party knows more than the other, for example a used-car seller. This can lead to poor decisions and under-trading of good products.
- Market power, such as a monopoly, allows a firm to restrict output and raise price above the competitive level, creating allocative inefficiency.
Government responses
Governments have several tools, each with strengths and weaknesses.
- Indirect taxes raise the private cost of a good with negative externalities, shifting supply left and reducing output toward the efficient level. Australia's tobacco excise is a clear example.
- Subsidies lower costs for goods with positive externalities, shifting supply right and raising output, for example subsidies for vaccination or renewable energy.
- Regulation sets legal rules, such as emission limits, fishing quotas or minimum standards.
- Direct provision supplies public goods such as defence and public health.
- Tradable permits cap total pollution and let firms trade the right to emit, using the market to find the cheapest reductions.
- Education and information campaigns correct information failure.
In evaluation questions, identify the failure, recommend a policy, explain how it changes the diagram, and then weigh up its costs, benefits and the risk of government failure.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of TASC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2022 TASCWhat is meant by market failure? Describe, with examples, two (2) ways in which markets may 'fail'.Show worked answer →
Definition. Market failure occurs when the free operation of the price mechanism leads to an inefficient allocation of resources, so society's welfare is not maximised (too much or too little of a good is produced).
Two ways, each described with an example:
- Externalities. Production or consumption imposes costs or benefits on third parties not reflected in the price. Negative externality example: a factory polluting a river over-produces because it ignores the clean-up cost. Positive externality example: education is under-produced because private buyers ignore the wider social benefit.
- Public goods. Goods that are non-excludable and non-rival (for example street lighting or national defence) are not provided by private markets because of the free-rider problem, so they are under-supplied or not supplied at all.
Other acceptable answers include market power (monopoly restricting output) and asymmetric information. Naming the type of failure, explaining why it is inefficient, and giving a valid example earns full marks.
2024 TASCExplain the role of government in a mixed market economy. Describe, using two (2) examples, how government policy can address market failure. For each example include the aim of the government intervention and how this is achieved.Show worked answer →
Role of government. In a mixed market economy most resources are allocated by the price mechanism, but government intervenes to correct market failure, provide public goods, redistribute income and stabilise the economy.
Two examples of policy correcting market failure, each stating the aim and the method:
- Negative externality - a tax. Aim: reduce over-consumption or over-production of a good with social costs, such as carbon emissions or tobacco. How achieved: an indirect tax raises the private cost toward the social cost, shifting supply left, raising price and cutting quantity to the socially efficient level.
- Positive externality - a subsidy or direct provision. Aim: raise output of a good with social benefits, such as education or vaccination. How achieved: a subsidy lowers price (or the government provides the good directly), increasing the quantity consumed toward the socially desirable level.
A strong answer links each intervention back to the type of failure it corrects and notes that government action carries its own costs and risks of government failure.