Skip to main content

Food marketing and the media (SACE Stage 2 Nutrition)

Syllabus dot point

“Analyse how food marketing, advertising and the media influence food choice, including the marketing of foods to children”

7 min read

Quick answer

Food marketing shapes choice through advertising, packaging, pricing, product placement, celebrity endorsement and social media. Much marketing promotes energy-dense, sugary and fatty foods because they are profitable, which can push choices away from healthier options. The marketing of these foods to children is a particular concern because children are easily influenced and brand preferences formed early can last. You should be able to analyse how marketing and the media influence food choice and weigh up the issues, including marketing aimed at children.

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. How marketing influences food choice
  3. The media and food trends
  4. Marketing food to children
  5. Why this matters
  6. Digital and targeted marketing
  7. Exam-style questions

What this dot point is asking

You need to analyse the ways marketing and the media influence what people eat, and consider the issues this raises, especially the marketing of unhealthy foods to children.

How marketing influences food choice

Food companies use many techniques to shape demand:

  • Advertising across television, online and outdoor media builds awareness and desire.
  • Packaging and branding use colour, characters, claims and design to make a product appealing and trustworthy.
  • Pricing and promotions such as discounts, bundles and meal deals make some foods cheaper and more attractive.
  • Product placement puts items at eye level, near checkouts or in prominent displays to prompt impulse buying.
  • Celebrity and influencer endorsement transfers a person's appeal onto a product.
  • Social media spreads food trends, sponsored content and targeted advertising based on user data.

Because these techniques work on emotion, habit and convenience, they can lead people to choose foods they did not plan to, often energy-dense products rather than fresh whole foods.

Beyond paid advertising, the media shapes food culture through cooking shows, news, diet trends and social media content. This can be positive, raising awareness of healthy eating, or misleading, spreading fad diets and unverified claims. A key skill is judging whether food information is evidence based or marketing dressed up as advice.

Marketing food to children

The marketing of unhealthy foods to children is a particular concern. Children are still developing the ability to recognise persuasion, so they are easily influenced by cartoon characters, toys, games and bright packaging. Brand preferences formed early can persist into adulthood, and children also influence family purchases, sometimes called pester power.

Because of this, there is debate about regulating food advertising to children, for example limiting advertising of high-sugar and high-fat foods during children's viewing times. Supporters argue it protects health; critics raise concerns about industry freedom and effectiveness. This is a good issue to evaluate from more than one side.

Marketing favours profitable, energy-dense foods

Companies advertise most heavily the foods that are most profitable, which are often energy-dense, sugary or fatty products, not fresh whole foods. This is why marketing can shift choices in a less healthy direction, especially for children who are easily influenced.

Why this matters

Marketing is one of the strongest social influences on food choice, linking the personal and economic factors covered elsewhere in Topic 3. Being able to analyse marketing critically helps explain real dietary patterns and supports balanced evaluation of issues such as advertising regulation, which examiners often ask about.

Digital and targeted marketing

Modern food marketing has shifted heavily towards digital and targeted channels, which raises new concerns. Social media platforms collect data on what people watch, search and buy, so advertisements can be aimed at very specific groups, including young people, at the exact moments they are most likely to respond. Influencer content blurs the line between a genuine recommendation and a paid promotion, making it harder for viewers to recognise advertising. Sponsored posts, branded games (advergames) and unboxing videos can reach children directly on their own devices, outside the reach of traditional television advertising rules.

This matters for evaluation because it shows that regulating one channel, such as children's television, may simply push marketing to less-regulated platforms. A strong response recognises that the influence of marketing is now spread across many channels and that effective responses need media literacy and broad regulation, not a single rule.

Analysing a cereal advertisement aimed at children

Step 1: Identify the techniques used

Suppose an advertisement uses a cartoon mascot, bright colours, a free toy, and a claim of being a source of vitamins. List each persuasive technique separately.

Step 2: Explain why each works on children

The mascot and colours create appeal and recognition; the free toy adds an incentive unrelated to the food; the vitamin claim makes a sugary product seem healthy. Children cannot easily see these as persuasion.

Step 3: Check the nutrition behind the claim

A source-of-vitamins claim can sit on a product still high in added sugar, so the front-of-pack message can mislead. This links to reading the Nutrition Information Panel rather than trusting the advertisement.

Step 4: Form a judgement

Conclude that the advertisement uses several techniques to make an energy-dense product appealing to children, which is why marketing to children is a health concern. Naming each technique and its effect, plus the nutrition check, is the analysis the question rewards.

Common errors
Treating marketing as just advertisements
It includes packaging, pricing, placement, endorsement and social media, not only television ads.
Assuming people choose freely with no outside influence
Marketing is designed to shape behaviour, often below conscious awareness.
Giving a one-sided view on child advertising
Strong answers weigh protecting children against arguments about regulation and industry, rather than just asserting one side.
Confusing media information with evidence
Trends and influencer claims are not the same as evidence-based nutrition advice.

In short, marketing and the media shape food choice through advertising, packaging, pricing, placement and social media, often promoting energy-dense foods, and the marketing of these foods to children raises particular health and regulation concerns.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of SACE Board exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

SACE 2022-style2 marks
Less than 1% of children aged 2 to 3 years consume their recommended daily intake of vegetables and legumes/beans. Identify one media campaign and explain how it helps families ensure that children consume their RDI of vegetables and legumes/beans.
Show worked answer →

One mark for naming a real media campaign, one mark for explaining how it works.

A strong example is the Go for 2 and 5 campaign. It is a government media campaign using television, print and online advertising to promote eating two serves of fruit and five serves of vegetables each day (1 mark).

It helps families by raising awareness of how much fruit and vegetables children need, using a simple, memorable message, and by giving practical serving ideas. This encourages parents to offer more vegetables and legumes at meals, increasing the chance children reach their RDI (1 mark).

Other accepted campaigns include LiveLighter or state-based healthy eating campaigns, explained the same way.

SACE 2021-style4 marks
Evaluate the argument that advertising of unhealthy foods to children should be more strictly regulated.
Show worked answer →

Four marks need both sides and a justified judgement.

For regulation: children cannot easily recognise persuasion, so they are vulnerable to characters, toys and bright packaging; early brand preferences can last into adulthood; and most advertised foods are energy-dense, contributing to childhood obesity (about 2 marks).

Against, or limits: industry argues advertising supports business and consumer choice, parents also influence choices, and bans may simply shift marketing to less regulated platforms such as social media, reducing their effect (1 mark).

Judgement: on balance the health vulnerability of children justifies stricter regulation, but it works best combined with parental education and controls across all media, not television alone (1 mark).

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained