Does justice depend on the lawyers you can afford?
Explain the roles of legal personnel and the importance of legal representation, and evaluate how this affects access to justice.
The roles of judges, magistrates, lawyers and prosecutors, the importance of legal representation, and how access to representation affects whether justice is genuinely accessible.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
You must explain the roles of the main legal personnel, the importance of representation, and evaluate how it affects access to justice.
The main legal personnel
Several roles keep the justice system running, each with a distinct function.
- Judges preside over higher courts, decide questions of law, manage trials, and sentence in criminal matters. They must be independent and impartial.
- Magistrates preside over the Magistrates Court, dealing with the large volume of minor and preliminary matters, sitting without a jury.
- Lawyers advise clients and represent them in court. In Australia the profession includes solicitors, who handle advice and preparation, and barristers, who specialise in advocacy.
- Prosecutors bring criminal cases on behalf of the state, such as the Director of Public Prosecutions or police prosecutors in the Magistrates Court.
Why representation matters
The adversarial system assumes both sides are competently represented. The decision-maker is passive, so the case largely depends on how well each side gathers evidence, examines witnesses and argues the law. A self-represented party faces a serious disadvantage against a represented opponent.
The role of impartiality and independence
Judges and magistrates must be independent and impartial, which is part of the separation of powers and the rule of law. They must apply the law without favour, give a fair hearing and avoid bias. This independence is what allows the public to trust that decisions are based on law and evidence rather than political or personal influence.
Effect on access to justice
The reliance on representation creates a tension between the empowered and the disempowered. Those who can afford experienced lawyers may be better placed than those who cannot, which threatens equality before the law. Measures such as legal aid, duty solicitors, community legal centres and pro bono work try to reduce this gap, but limited funding means many people still go unrepresented or under-represented.
Connection to the rest of the course
This dot point links the adversarial system, the court hierarchy, the rule of law and access to justice. It directly supports the dispute resolution focus area question of whether justice depends on the abilities of lawyers and the interpretation of judges.