Explain how transnational corporations organise global production networks, analyse their uneven spatial impacts, and evaluate their costs and benefits for host and home countries.

What this dot point is asking

This dot point develops the globalisation topic by zooming into the firms that actually create global connections. The key geographical idea is the spatial division of labour: TNCs locate each stage of production wherever costs, skills or access are most favourable, knitting distant places into a single network.

How TNCs organise production networks

A global production network spreads the stages of making a product across many countries. A typical structure includes:

• Headquarters and research in high-income countries, where skilled labour and capital concentrate.
• Component manufacture in countries with specialised industries.
• Assembly in countries with lower labour costs.
• Sales and marketing in the largest consumer markets.

Apple, for example, designs in the United States, sources components from many countries, and assembles largely in East and South Asia. This is the spatial division of labour in action, and it depends on cheap transport (containerisation), fast communication and reduced trade barriers.

Why TNCs locate where they do

Location decisions follow factors including labour cost and skills, access to raw materials, proximity to markets, infrastructure, government incentives such as tax breaks and special economic zones, and political stability. Because these factors differ by place, TNCs can relocate production when conditions change, which gives them significant power over host governments.

Uneven spatial and social impacts

Host countries can gain jobs, investment, technology transfer and export income. China's growth was accelerated by TNC investment in manufacturing. But host countries may also experience low wages, poor working conditions, environmental damage and dependence on firms that can leave. Nike and other apparel brands faced sustained criticism over conditions in supplier factories. Home countries gain corporate profits and high-value jobs but may lose manufacturing employment through offshoring, contributing to regional decline.

Consequences across the three systems

Economically, TNCs integrate national economies, drive trade and create both employment and dependence. Socially, they spread consumer culture and can improve incomes while sometimes exploiting labour and weakening local industries. Environmentally, dispersed production can shift pollution to countries with weaker regulation, a pattern sometimes called the pollution-haven effect.

Evaluating the role of TNCs

Evaluation weighs benefits against costs and asks who captures them. TNCs can be engines of development and efficiency, but their power, mobility and ability to minimise tax mean the gains are unevenly shared. Strong answers judge specific cases: a TNC that brings stable, well-paid jobs and skills transfer is more positive than one that pays the minimum and relocates at the first cost rise.

Linking it together

A complete response explains how TNCs build global production networks through the spatial division of labour, shows why value concentrates at the design and retail ends, analyses uneven impacts on host and home countries, and evaluates costs and benefits using cases such as Apple or Nike. That structure matches the geographical skills and applications criteria the SACE Board assesses.