How can we measure and predict genetic change in a population?
Explain allele frequencies and gene pools, and use the Hardy-Weinberg principle to detect change
A gene pool is all the alleles in a population; allele frequencies measure their proportions. The Hardy-Weinberg principle predicts frequencies in a non-evolving population so deviations reveal evolution.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
You need to define gene pool and allele frequency, state the Hardy-Weinberg conditions, and use the Hardy-Weinberg equations to calculate allele and genotype frequencies. This dot point treats evolution quantitatively.
Gene pools and allele frequencies
A gene pool is the total collection of all alleles for all genes in a population. The allele frequency is the proportion of a particular allele among all the copies of that gene in the population.
Evolution can be defined at this level as a change in allele frequencies in a gene pool over generations. The mechanisms that change them are natural selection, genetic drift, gene flow and mutation. This definition is powerful because it makes evolution measurable: rather than describing whole organisms changing, we track the proportions of alleles, which lets the Hardy-Weinberg model give precise, testable predictions.
To calculate an allele frequency directly, count the copies of that allele and divide by the total number of allele copies in the population. For a gene with two alleles in a diploid population of individuals there are allele copies in total. For example, if a population of individuals contains copies of allele A and copies of allele a, then the frequency of A is and the frequency of a is , which together sum to as required.
The Hardy-Weinberg principle
The Hardy-Weinberg principle describes a theoretical population in which allele frequencies stay constant from generation to generation - a population that is not evolving. It acts as a null model: if a real population matches it, no evolution is occurring; if it deviates, evolution is.
It uses two equations, where and are the frequencies of two alleles of a gene:
Here is the frequency of the homozygous dominant genotype, the heterozygous genotype, and the homozygous recessive genotype.
The conditions for equilibrium
Allele frequencies stay constant only if all the following hold:
- a large population (so drift is negligible)
- no mutation
- no gene flow (no migration)
- random mating
- no natural selection
If any condition is broken, allele frequencies can change - that is, evolution can occur.
Reading the equations carefully
The most common stumbling block is mapping the right quantity to the right symbol. Work in this order: the observed recessive phenotype gives (because only homozygous recessive individuals show it), so take the square root to get the recessive allele frequency . Then gives the dominant allele frequency. Only then can you find the genotype frequencies: for homozygous dominant, for heterozygous carriers, and for homozygous recessive. A useful sanity check is that the three genotype frequencies must always add to , and the two allele frequencies must always add to . If they do not, an arithmetic slip has crept in.
Why deviation signals evolution
The real value of the Hardy-Weinberg model is as a null hypothesis. It tells you what the genotype frequencies should be if none of the evolutionary forces are acting. If a real population's observed genotype frequencies match the predicted ratio, then within the limits of measurement no evolution is detected. If they differ - for example, far fewer homozygous recessives than predicted - then at least one condition is being broken, and you can reason about which force is responsible. Heavy selection against the recessive phenotype would lower over generations; a small population would let drift shift frequencies randomly; immigration would introduce gene flow. This is how a static equation becomes a tool for detecting and quantifying evolutionary change.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SACE Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
SACE 20181 marksAbout 250 black robins live on the Chatham Islands, all descended from one female. State the term that refers to all the genetic information in the interbreeding population of black robins.Show worked answer →
The gene pool. The gene pool is the total of all the alleles of all the genes present in all the individuals of an interbreeding population. The mark is for naming the gene pool.
SACE 20224 marksIn a population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, of individuals are homozygous recessive (aa) for a gene. (a) Calculate the frequency of the recessive allele. (b) Calculate the percentage of the population that are heterozygous carriers. (c) State one Hardy-Weinberg condition and explain how breaking it could change the allele frequencies.Show worked answer →
Four marks: one for (a), one for (b), two for (c).
- (a) Recessive allele frequency (1 mark)
- , so .
- (b) Carrier percentage (1 mark)
- First . Heterozygous carriers , so of the population are carriers.
- (c) A condition and its effect (2 marks)
- Any one valid condition, for example "no natural selection". If selection acts (one condition broken), individuals with one genotype survive and reproduce more than others, so they pass on more of their alleles. This changes the allele frequencies in the next generation's gene pool, meaning the population is evolving and no longer in equilibrium. (Other valid conditions: large population - else genetic drift; no migration - else gene flow; no mutation; random mating.)
Markers reward the correct square-root step, the calculation, and a named condition correctly linked to a change in allele frequency.
