Skip to main content
Business Management study scene
§-Past paper
VICBusiness Management2024

VCE Business Management 2024

Walkthrough of the 2024 VCE Business Management exam: every question mapped with its average mark, six model answers (including the 10-mark employee management analysis and the Soaring Rox case study), and the errors the VCAA report flagged.

Marks
75
Time
120 min
Authority
VCAA
Updated

A walkthrough of the 2024 VCE Business Management examination: a 75-mark paper with four scenario-based questions in Section A (Sammah's Foodz, Surf 'n Stuff, Allygant Attire and a 10-mark extended response) and a six-question case study on Soaring Rox, a city rock-climbing centre, in Section B. This page maps every question with the average mark from the VCAA report, works six of the hardest or highest-value questions with our own model answers, and lists the specific errors the examiners saw.

How to use this page

  • Questions are from the 2024 VCE Business Management examination, copyright Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA), listed on the VCAA Business Management examinations page. Each question is summarised here, not reproduced; open the official examination PDF for the scenarios, the Soaring Rox case study, the online reviews and the website hits versus market share graph.
  • Answers and guidance are our own responses, written to the marking guidance in the 2024 Business Management external assessment report (Word document). They are not copies of VCAA's sample answers. Averages and mark distributions are from the report.
  • Study design. This paper was set on the current VCE Business Management study design (2023 to 2027), so every question is on the course you are studying now.

Structure and timing

The paper was 75 marks in 2 hours of writing time, plus 15 minutes reading time, in a 24-page question and answer book. There was no multiple-choice section.

  • Section A (4 questions, 50 marks): three short-scenario questions of 15, 15 and 10 marks, each broken into parts worth 2 to 6 marks, then Question 4, a single 10-mark extended response that asks you to use a contemporary business case study.
  • Section B (6 questions, 25 marks): one case study (Soaring Rox Pty Ltd, with three one-star reviews, a graph and a list of changes the CEO has announced), and six questions worth 2 to 6 marks. Every answer must apply to the case study.

That is 1.6 minutes per mark. A workable plan: use reading time on the Section B case study and the Question 4 prompt, since both reward planning. Then give Section A about 80 minutes (keep about 16 minutes for Question 4) and Section B about 40 minutes. The report stressed time management: overly detailed answers to low-mark parts can leave too little time for higher-mark questions such as the 10-mark Question 4.

The report also notes that the 2024 Business Management examination was one of five VCE examinations affected by the early publication of examination material. An expert panel reviewed the results and adjusted the study score process so that no student was disadvantaged.

What this paper assessed

Averages are from the report's mark distribution tables. Unit and area of study references are to the current study design.

Section A (50 marks)

Question 1 (15 marks): Sammah's Foodz, a manufacturer of frozen savoury foods no competitor offers, which has introduced new technology to widen its range and cut waste, and faces employee resistance.

  • 1a (2 marks). Describe one key element of the operations system (inputs, processes or outputs) at the business. Operations management. Average 1.2 (30% scored 0).
  • 1b (3 marks). Describe one low-risk strategy to overcome employee resistance to change. Implementing change. Average 2.0.
  • 1c (6 marks). Explain how reduce, reuse and recycle could minimise waste in the production process. Operations management (waste minimisation). Average 3.9.
  • 1d (4 marks). Discuss Porter's differentiation approach as the business seeks more sales. Reviewing performance, the need for change (Porter's Generic Strategies). Average 2.2.

Question 2 (15 marks): Surf 'n Stuff, a surfwear and surfboard manufacturer with three 2024 objectives (net profit up 10%, defective swimwear outputs down 20%, staff absenteeism down to 2% a year) and a CEO who wants to apply Senge's Learning Organisation.

  • 2a (2 marks). Define quality in relation to operations management. Operations management. Average 1.4.
  • 2b (4 marks). Compare effectiveness and efficiency. Business foundations (business objectives) and operations management. Average 2.1.
  • 2c (3 marks). Explain how either artificial intelligence or computer-aided design could improve efficiency at the business. Operations management (technology strategies). Average 1.9.
  • 2d (6 marks). Explain how the business could apply two principles of Senge's Learning Organisation to build a positive culture for change. Implementing change. Average 2.9.

Question 3 (10 marks): Allygant Attire, which hires out formal wear, has spent heavily on online advertising and plans to close six shopping-centre stores and build up its website.

  • 3a (3 marks). Describe one way to improve corporate social responsibility within the operations management system. Operations management. Average 1.3 (33% scored 0), the weakest short-answer part relative to its marks.
  • 3b (4 marks). Explain two restraining forces for the website change. Reviewing performance (force field analysis). Average 2.4.
  • 3c (3 marks). Justify using Lewin's Three-step Change Model at the business. Implementing change. Average 1.5.

Question 4 (10 marks)

  • Analyse how the management of employees can affect the achievement of business objectives, referring to strategies used to manage employees and at least one contemporary case study. Human resource management. Average 4.0 (40% of the marks, the lowest of any question); only 10% of students scored 8 or more.

Section B: Soaring Rox case study (25 marks)

Soaring Rox, run by CEO Mia Tarian, has relied on inexperienced staff and received three one-star reviews in December 2023 about staff not knowing the equipment, no first aid and not feeling safe. A graph shows website hits and market share from July 2023 to June 2024. Mia announces three decisions at a staff meeting: compulsory equipment training on three Sundays with the centre closed, a first-aid room (replacing the staffroom) with a first-aid provider at busy times, and returning little-used equipment to local suppliers while buying high-demand equipment from overseas.

  • Q1 (2 marks). Outline how Mia could use planning as a management skill to implement one of the changes. Business foundations (management skills). Average 1.2.
  • Q2 (3 marks). Interpret the relationship between website hits and market share in the graph. Reviewing performance (KPIs). Average 1.7.
  • Q3 (4 marks). Describe a conflict between two stakeholder groups as Mia works to improve the business's reputation. Business foundations (stakeholders). Average 2.0.
  • Q4 (6 marks). Evaluate the appropriateness of Mia's management style as she implements the changes. Business foundations (management styles). Average 3.3.
  • Q5 (4 marks). Explain the importance of reviewing KPIs to evaluate the effectiveness of the business transformation. Implementing change. Average 2.1.
  • Q6 (6 marks). Discuss on-the-job training as a strategy to improve employees' skills. Human resource management. Average 3.5.

Worked practice questions (exam-style)

Worked example

Question 4 (10 marks): Managing employees and business objectives

Based on Section A Question 4 (10 marks). Analyse how the way a business manages its employees affects whether it achieves its objectives. Use strategies for managing employees and at least one contemporary business case study.

Model answer (plan and key paragraphs). Pick a case study where the objectives and the employee strategies are both clear. The report's example used a supermarket's introduction of AI-monitored self-service checkouts; any real business from the past four years works if you can name its objectives. The structure below uses that kind of example.

  1. Set up the case and the objectives. A large supermarket chain adds AI detection to its self-service checkouts. Name the specific objectives: reduce the value of stock lost to theft, and through that increase net profit. Naming the objectives up front lets every later paragraph link back to them.
  2. Strategy 1: training. Staff receive on-the-job training on the new system, including what to do when an exit gate stays closed, which may mean theft or may mean a scanning error. Trained staff respond correctly and quickly, so more theft is stopped and fewer honest customers are upset. Effect on objective: lower inventory losses reduce expenses, which lifts net profit.
  3. Strategy 2: motivation. With scanning now done by customers, staff roles shift to helping customers and watching for problems. A motivation strategy such as performance-related pay for staff who help a set number of customers each shift keeps them alert and engaged. Effect on objective: attentive staff catch more losses and improve service, supporting both the loss objective and customer satisfaction. Identifying keen staff through this process also helps target future training spending.
  4. Strategy 3: performance management. Managers observe staff at the checkouts to check they are acting on the AI alerts. Where they are not, feedback and retraining follow. Effect on objective: the business can see whether the change is actually cutting losses and correct problems before they erode profit.
  5. Analyse, not just list. Show the chain in each paragraph: strategy, what changes in employee behaviour, which objective moves and why. Where relevant, note a limit (for example, training costs money up front, so it only helps net profit if losses fall by more than the training costs).

Marker's note: The report wanted several strategies for managing employees, a clear explanation of how each affects a named objective, and real application to a contemporary case study. Answers lost marks for using management styles, management skills or motivation theories in place of strategies, for automation or AI strategies with no employee angle, for saying "objectives" without naming them, and for writing a change management answer instead of an employee management one.

Worked example

Question 2d (6 marks): Senge's Learning Organisation at Surf 'n Stuff

Based on Section A Question 2d (6 marks). Explain how the surfwear manufacturer could use two of Senge's Learning Organisation principles to build a culture that is positive towards change.

Model answer
(a) Personal mastery
Personal mastery is each employee committing to continually develop their own skills and understanding. Surf 'n Stuff could fund training so production staff build expertise in wetsuit and swimwear construction, and let them set personal development goals. Employees who feel skilled and confident see change (such as new processes to cut defective swimwear by 20%) as something they can handle rather than a threat, so they are more willing to accept it. That openness is a positive culture for change.
(b) Shared vision
Shared vision means everyone in the business is committed to a common picture of where it is heading. Sandy Waters could involve staff in shaping the 2024 objectives, for example by holding team sessions on why reducing defects and absenteeism matters for the business's future. When employees own the vision, they support the changes needed to reach it instead of resisting them, so change is welcomed rather than imposed.
Marker's note
Any two of team learning, personal mastery, shared vision, mental models and systems thinking were accepted. Full marks needed each principle explained, applied to Surf 'n Stuff with more than its name or the CEO's name, and linked to a culture that is positive towards change, not just a positive culture in general.
Worked example

Question 3a (3 marks): Corporate social responsibility at Allygant Attire

Based on Section A Question 3a (3 marks). Describe one way the formal-wear hire business could improve corporate social responsibility within its operations management system.

Model answer. Allygant Attire's key inputs are the garments it buys to hire out. It could improve its corporate social responsibility by sourcing that formal wear only from suppliers that use environmentally sustainable materials and ethical labour practices. In practice it would set sourcing standards, check or audit its suppliers against them, and switch suppliers that fall short. This reduces the environmental and social harm caused by its operations, beyond what the law requires, while still giving customers quality garments to hire.

Marker's note: This was the lowest-scoring short-answer part of the paper for its marks (average 1.3 of 3; only Question 4 scored lower as a share of its marks). The strategy had to sit within operations and fit a hire business. The report said many answers wrote about supporting staff who lose their jobs when stores close (a human resources matter), treated the business as a manufacturer, or gave a long definition of CSR without applying it. No definition of CSR was required.

Worked example

Question 3c (3 marks): Justifying Lewin's Three-step Change Model

Based on Section A Question 3c (3 marks). Justify the use of Lewin's Three-step Change Model when Allygant Attire implements its change (closing six stores and moving to online services).

Model answer.

  • It gives managers a clear structure for a big change. The model sets out three stages, unfreeze, change and refreeze, so managers know what to do and in what order. For example, in the unfreeze stage they would explain to staff why the stores are closing and why online services matter for the business's future, which lowers resistance before the change starts. That clarity makes a large change more likely to succeed.
  • It makes the change last. The refreeze stage embeds the new way of working in the business's policies, routines and culture, for example making website service targets part of normal operations. This stops Allygant Attire drifting back to a store-based focus once the six stores have closed, so the money spent on online advertising and the website pays off in the long term.

Marker's note: "Justify" means give reasons the model is a good choice. The report said most students only described the three steps and did not state any benefit, which capped their mark. It also noted that refreeze means embedding the change, not evaluating it.

Worked example

Question B2 (3 marks): Website hits and market share

Based on Section B Question 2 (3 marks). Interpret the relationship between Soaring Rox's number of website hits and its market share, using the graph in the case study.

Model answer.

  1. Use the data. Website hits were about 8 200 in July 2023, dipped to about 7 500 in August, then climbed to a peak of about 9 300 in December 2023. They then fell sharply to about 6 000 in January 2024 and kept falling to under 3 000 (about 2 800) by June 2024. Market share held at about 12% from July 2023 to January 2024, then fell steadily to 9% by April, held at 9% in May and dropped to about 8% by June 2024.
  2. State the relationship. The two KPIs move in the same direction, but website hits started falling first (straight after December) and market share followed from January, about a month later.
  3. Explain the cause. The drop in website visits came straight after the three negative reviews in December 2023, as fewer potential customers chose to look at the centre online. With fewer people visiting the site to find booking or contact details, fewer climbing sessions were booked, so Soaring Rox's sales fell relative to other climbing centres in the city and its market share declined.

Final answer: A direct relationship: falling website hits (following the December reviews) led to fewer bookings and so a lower share of the city's rock-climbing sales, from about 12% to about 8%.

Marker's note: Most students said the two lines fell together but did not explain how one affected the other. Full marks needed graph data, case study information and a cause-and-effect explanation. The report also accepted the reverse direction (lower market share meaning fewer people visit the website) if it was explained.

Worked example

Question B4 (6 marks): Evaluating Mia Tarian's management style

Based on Section B Question 4 (6 marks). Evaluate how appropriate Mia's management style is as she introduces the changes at Soaring Rox.

Model answer
Identify the style from the evidence
Mia is using an autocratic style: she made the decisions (compulsory Sunday training, replacing the staffroom with a first-aid room, changing suppliers) without consulting staff, and simply told them at a meeting.
(a) Advantage: speed in a crisis
With centralised decision making Mia can act at once. Soaring Rox's reputation for safety is under attack and market share has fallen from about 12% to about 8%, so fast action on training and first aid addresses the reviews' complaints before more customers are lost.
(b) Advantage: clear direction
One-way communication makes it clear exactly what is expected, for example that every employee must attend the three training sessions. This means the safety changes happen as intended.
(c) Disadvantage: lower morale
Staff had no say in losing their staffroom or giving up three Sundays. Feeling ignored can reduce morale and raise staff turnover, which adds recruitment and training costs, a real problem for a business already relying on inexperienced staff.
(d) Disadvantage: lost ideas
Employees on the climbing floor may know where a first-aid room or first-aid provider would be most useful, or which equipment customers actually use, but those ideas are never heard.
Judgement
The autocratic style is appropriate in the short term because the safety problems are urgent and the reputation damage is costing sales, and changes such as equipment training are not optional. However, it risks losing the goodwill of the very staff Mia needs to deliver safer, high-quality experiences, so it suits the immediate crisis better than the longer rebuilding of the business's reputation.
Marker's note
Most students correctly identified the autocratic style. High-scoring answers weighed advantages and disadvantages using case study evidence and ended with an evidence-based judgement. A bare opinion ("I think it is appropriate") or a generic line ("the advantages outweigh the disadvantages") did not count as evaluation, and suggesting an alternative style was not needed.

Common errors students made

  • Unrequested definitions (general). Marks were not given for definitions the question did not ask for, such as defining low-risk strategy in Question 1b, CSR in Question 3a, autocratic style in Section B Question 4 or on-the-job training in Section B Question 6.
  • Question 1a. Treating the new technology as a process. Technology is an input; a process is what is done, best described with verbs such as mixing, cutting, packaging and freezing.
  • Question 1b. Naming the business without linking the strategy to employees' likely concerns about the new technology or the waste changes. When using support, students needed to say what kind of support (for example, counselling).
  • Question 1c. Circular definitions ("recycling is when something is recycled") and answers that did not tie reduce, reuse and recycle to a food manufacturer (perishable ingredients, packaging, the new technology).
  • Question 1d. Leaving out disadvantages, defining Porter's differentiation approach without discussing it, and not linking it to the number of sales.
  • Question 2a. Using "quality" as a describing word rather than explaining what it means in operations.
  • Question 2b. Defining both terms instead of comparing them; describing effectiveness as how well a product works (it is about achieving objectives); and confusing efficiency with productivity or with effectiveness.
  • Question 2c. Vague or unrealistic AI uses that did not fit a manufacturer, and explaining how a strategy met one of the stated objectives (effectiveness) rather than improved efficiency.
  • Question 2d. Only naming the business or CEO as the "link" to the case, and explaining a positive culture without mentioning change.
  • Question 3a. Choosing CSR strategies outside operations (such as looking after staff who leave), or treating Allygant Attire as a manufacturer.
  • Question 3b. Naming restraining forces (employees, time, organisational inertia) without explaining why and how each would slow the move online, and not distinguishing two similar forces.
  • Question 3c. Describing the three steps with no benefits, and treating refreeze as evaluating the change instead of embedding it.
  • Question 4. Using management styles, skills or motivation theories as strategies; strategies with no employee angle (automated lines, AI); unnamed objectives; claims of improvement with no explanation; and change management answers driven by a memorised case study.
  • Section B Question 1. Writing about how planning had been used rather than how it could be used, or naming an objective (such as the first-aid room) and just saying planning would be needed.
  • Section B Question 2. Noting the two lines fall together without explaining the causal link.
  • Section B Question 3. Treating conflict as an argument or physical fight, discussing only one stakeholder group, and inventing facts not in the case (for example, that staff would not be paid for the training).
  • Section B Question 5. Explaining KPIs as a driver of change, when the question was about reviewing them while the transformation is already under way.
  • Section B Question 6. Justifying rather than discussing, and not linking advantages and disadvantages to the climbing centre.

How to use this paper

Sit the whole paper in 2 hours with 15 minutes reading, spending that reading time on the Soaring Rox case study and planning Question 4. Then mark each answer against the criteria in the report and the worked answers above, checking three things the examiners kept returning to: did you do what the command term asked (analyse, interpret, justify and evaluate were the weakest), did you link every point to the business in the question with more than its name, and did you avoid unrequested definitions. Finally, build two or three contemporary case studies covering different areas of study, with named objectives and employee strategies, so a question like Question 4 does not push you into a change management answer.

Use this paper well

  1. Sit the paper under exam conditions (120 minutes, 75 marks).
  2. Mark yourself against the official VCAA marking notes.
  3. Compare against the Business Management hub to find the syllabus dot points this paper tested.

Keep going

ExamExplained