HSC English 2023 Paper 1

Walkthrough of the 2023 HSC English Paper 1 (Common Module: Texts and Human Experiences). Section 1 unseen approach, Section 2 essay strategy, and what the NESA notes from marking centre rewarded.

Marks: 40
Time: 90 min
Authority: NESA
Updated: 2026-05-29

Open the official PDF ->Official marking notes

What this paper assessed

HSC English Paper 1 (Standard and Advanced share the same paper) examines the Common Module: Texts and Human Experiences. The module asks students to consider how texts represent individual and collective human experiences, the human qualities and emotions associated with them, and the anomalies, paradoxes and inconsistencies in human behaviour. The 2023 paper had two sections worth 20 marks each:

Section I - Unseen texts (20 marks): a suite of short prose extracts, a poem and a visual/multimodal text, each accompanied by short-answer questions of escalating mark value (typically 2, 3, 4 and 6 marks).
Section II - Essay on the prescribed text (20 marks): one extended response on the student's set text (a play, prose fiction, poetry, film, nonfiction or a Shakespearean drama), responding to a question framed around human experiences.

Markers reward responses that name the form of each text precisely (memoir, lyric poem, photograph, short story) and select techniques that genuinely produce an effect, rather than naming the most obvious device on the page. The strongest scripts treat "human experiences" as something to analyse, not a phrase to repeat.

Structure and timing

The paper is 40 marks in 90 minutes (plus 10 minutes reading time) - about 2.25 minutes per mark.

Section I (20 marks): budget about 45 minutes. Scale time to mark value: roughly 5 minutes for a 2-mark item, up to 13-15 minutes for the 6-mark item, which typically asks you to compare two of the unseen texts.
Section II (20 marks): budget about 45 minutes for the essay - a few minutes planning a thesis and structure, then sustained writing.

Use the 10 minutes reading time to annotate the unseen texts (mark form, tone shifts, two strong techniques each) and to decode the essay question's key noun and directive verb. A practical split: 45 min Section I, 45 min Section II, with the last 3-4 minutes reserved to proofread the essay's topic sentences.

Worked practice questions (exam-style)

Worked example

Question 1 (3 marks): A short prose extract describes a narrator returning to a childhood home that has been sold. Analyse how the writer conveys the experience of loss. (Use an original 3-line extract: "I stood at the gate I once vaulted; a colour I would never have chosen; a dog that did not know my name.")

The writer conveys loss through the contrast between past mastery and present exclusion. The verb "vaulted" recalls a younger self at ease and in motion, set against the static "I stood at the gate", so the syntax itself stages the narrator's separation from a place that was once theirs.

The detail of "a colour I would never have chosen" uses the conditional to mark ownership that has passed to strangers, signalling that the home has continued without the narrator. The final image, a dog that "did not know my name", personalises the loss: even the living memory of belonging has been erased. The cumulative effect positions the responder to feel the quiet grief of a familiar place becoming foreign.

Worked example

Question 2 (6 marks): Compare how TWO of the unseen texts represent the relationship between memory and identity.

A strong 6-mark comparison is built on a shared concern (here, memory shaping identity) that the two texts treat differently, not on listing techniques text by text.

Take a reflective poem and a documentary photograph. The poem might use first-person retrospection and enjambment to suggest memory as fluid and reconstructive, the line breaks enacting the way recollection runs on and revises itself; identity emerges as something the speaker actively assembles from fragments. The photograph, by contrast, fixes a single moment: its framing and the gaze of the subject present memory as captured and external, an identity imposed by what the lens chose to preserve.

The comparison should be integrated: "Where the poem treats memory as an ongoing internal process, the photograph presents it as a fixed external record." A top response sustains this contrast across two or three points (form, perspective, the role of the responder) and finishes with a judgement about what each form reveals about how human identity depends on remembered experience.

Worked example

Question 3 (20 marks): "Texts about human experiences reveal that what is left unsaid can be as powerful as what is stated." To what extent does this view align with your prescribed text? (Essay)

Plan first. A high-band introduction states a clear thesis that engages the exact wording - "what is left unsaid" - rather than reciting a memorised contention. For example, for a prose or dramatic text, a thesis might argue that "through silence, omission and the gaps between characters, [text] reveals that the most consequential experiences resist articulation", while the form still invites the responder to read what is withheld.

Each body paragraph should anchor a structural moment of the text (an opening, a turning point, a resolution), introduce a technique that creates the unsaid (a pause, an ellipsis, an unreliable narrator, a dramatic gap between what a character says and does), analyse its effect, and tie back to the question's "to what extent". The middle paragraph is the place to complicate the prompt: perhaps some experiences in the text are stated directly, so the response argues the text balances the spoken and unspoken rather than privileging one.

The conclusion returns to the thesis with a refined judgement and a comment on why this matters for understanding human experience - not a summary of plot. Markers in the notes from marking centre consistently reward this sustained, evaluative engagement with the question's precise terms.

Common errors students made

The 2023 NESA notes from marking centre flagged prepared essays bolted onto the prompt, Section I answers that summarised the unseen text rather than analysing it, and Section II responses that confused thematic statements with analysis. Further recurring traps:

Technique-spotting without effect. Naming "imagery" or "metaphor" earns little unless you explain what the responder is positioned to think or feel.
Ignoring form. A poem, a memoir and a photograph make meaning differently; treating them all as generic "texts" loses the marks attached to formal features.
Mismatching answer length to mark value. Writing a paragraph for a 2-mark item wastes time you need for the 6-mark comparison and the essay.
A thesis that restates the question. The marker wants a position on the prompt, developed and complicated, not a rephrasing of it.

How to use this paper

Sit Section I in 45 minutes under exam conditions, then mark yourself line by line against the published NESA notes from marking centre and marking guidelines at the links in the frontmatter, checking whether each technique you named was tied to an effect. Then write Section II in 45 minutes on your own prescribed text using the 2023 prompt. Afterwards, rewrite your weakest unseen response and your essay's weakest body paragraph, this time planning the effect before the technique. Keep a log of which command words (analyse, explain, compare, assess) you are mishandling and re-test that question type next session.

Use this paper well

Sit the paper under exam conditions (90 minutes, 40 marks).
Mark yourself against the official NESA marking notes.
Compare against the English hub to find the syllabus dot points this paper tested.

What this paper assessed

Structure and timing

Worked practice questions (exam-style)

Common errors students made

How to use this paper

Use this paper well

Keep going