Inquiry Question 3: What evidence supports the relativistic model of the universe?
Investigate experimental and observational evidence for special relativity, including atmospheric and accelerator muon decay, GPS clock corrections, and the routine use of relativistic mechanics in particle physics
A focused answer to the HSC Physics Module 7 dot point on evidence for special relativity. Atmospheric muon flux at sea level, accelerator muon lifetimes, the daily GPS clock corrections (combined SR and GR), and the routine use of relativistic kinematics in particle physics.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
NESA wants you to give concrete experimental and observational evidence that special relativity is correct. The standard items are atmospheric and accelerator muon measurements, GPS satellite clock corrections, and the routine validation of relativistic kinematics in particle physics.
The answer
1. Atmospheric muons
Cosmic rays striking the upper atmosphere produce muons at altitudes around to km. Muons are unstable, with proper lifetime s and typical speeds of or more.
- Non-relativistic prediction
- In one proper lifetime, a muon at travels about m, so almost no muons should reach the ground.
- Relativistic prediction
- At , . The Earth-frame lifetime is s, and the muon travels about km in one dilated lifetime. A measurable fraction (about on average) survives to sea level.
- Measurement
- The Rossi-Hall experiment (1941) compared muon flux at the top of Mount Washington (elevation m) and at sea level. The ratio matched the relativistic prediction and ruled out the non-relativistic one by orders of magnitude. Modern detectors confirm this to high precision.
- The same effect in the muon frame
- From the muon's point of view, its own lifetime is just s. What changes is the distance to the ground: the atmosphere is length-contracted to km km, which a muon can comfortably cross in one proper lifetime. The two frames agree on the observed outcome (10% transit fraction) by different routes.
2. Accelerator muons
The Bailey et al. experiment (CERN, 1977) stored muons in a circular ring at (). The lab-frame lifetime was measured to be about s, times the rest-frame s, in agreement with to better than . The muons' centripetal acceleration in the storage ring was enormous (), confirming that time dilation depends only on instantaneous speed, not on acceleration.
3. GPS satellite clocks
GPS satellites orbit at km altitude with orbital speed km/s. A GPS receiver determines position by measuring the time-of-flight from at least four satellites, so the onboard clocks must agree with ground time to within a few nanoseconds to give metre-level positions.
Two relativistic effects shift the satellite clock rate:
- Special relativity (motion). A moving clock runs slow by , equivalent to s per day.
- General relativity (altitude). A clock higher in Earth's gravitational potential runs fast by , equivalent to s per day.
Net: the satellite clock runs about s per day faster than a ground clock. The correction is applied by adjusting the satellite's onboard oscillator frequency before launch (set slightly slow at MHz instead of the design MHz), and minor residual corrections are computed each day. Without these corrections, GPS positions would drift by about km per day - a clear failure of the system.
GPS is therefore an everyday technology that validates both special and general relativity in real time.
4. Particle physics kinematics
Every collision experiment at a modern accelerator (LHC at CERN, Belle II at KEK, RHIC at Brookhaven) is analysed with relativistic kinematics:
- Energy-momentum conservation uses the four-vector form, , not the non-relativistic .
- Track reconstruction in magnetic fields assumes with , not the non-relativistic version.
- Invariant masses of resonances (the Z boson, the Higgs boson) are reconstructed from decay products using the relativistic combination .
If any of this were wrong, particle identification and discoveries would fail. The Higgs boson was discovered in 2012 by reconstructing decays such as and , with invariant masses calculated using exactly the special-relativity machinery. The agreement of cross-sections, lifetimes and decay products with relativistic predictions at the per-cent level (or better) is the most thoroughly tested aspect of any physical theory.
5. Other supporting evidence
- Ives-Stilwell experiment (1938)
- A direct test of relativistic Doppler shift using hydrogen ion beams; agreed with relativity to a few per cent at the time and now to better than .
- Hafele-Keating experiment (1971)
- Atomic clocks flown on commercial aircraft eastward and westward around the world differed from a stationary ground clock by amounts predicted by SR (motion) and GR (altitude) combined.
- Pound-Rebka experiment (1959)
- Measured gravitational redshift of -keV gamma photons over m using the Mossbauer effect; supports general relativity, complementing SR evidence.
- Modern atomic-clock comparisons
- Optical lattice clocks at NIST can detect altitude differences of a few centimetres through gravitational time dilation.
Examples in context
Example 1. Australian-built GPS receivers and the correction. GPS satellites orbiting at and altitude experience two relativistic effects: SR time dilation slows their clocks by , while general-relativistic altitude makes them tick faster by . Net correction: . A Geoscience Australia GPS reference station at Yarragadee, WA, has measured this drift to better than precision over decades. Without the correction, positions would degrade by , making the system useless for navigation.
Example 2. Hafele-Keating-style experiment from Sydney. Two atomic clocks, one flown around the world eastward on a Sydney-London-Sydney commercial route at for (), the other left at Sydney Observatory. SR slowdown: . (GR speedup at altitude adds .) These nanosecond-level effects, predicted by SR and confirmed first by Hafele and Keating in 1971, demonstrate that moving clocks really do run slow. Caesium atomic clocks resolve the difference easily.
Try this
Q1. State one experimental observation that confirms time dilation and one that confirms length contraction. [2 marks]
- Cue. Time: cosmic muon flux at sea level (or GPS); length: atmosphere appears shorter in muon's frame (cosmic ray data).
Q2. Muons are created at and travel at . (a) Find . (b) Calculate how long the atmosphere appears in the muon's rest frame. [3 marks]
- Cue. (a) . (b) .
Q3. A particle accelerator at the Australian Synchrotron stores electrons at . (a) Calculate given electron rest energy . (b) Find the electron's speed as a fraction of . (c) Explain how the storage ring's existence at all is evidence for relativistic mass-energy. [2+3+2 marks]
- Cue. (a) . (b) , so . (c) Without relativistic momentum , the electrons would have impossible Newtonian momentum.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2021 HSC4 marksMuons produced at an altitude of 10 km travel toward the Earth at 0.99c. Their proper lifetime is 2.2 microseconds. Show, using a relativistic and a non-relativistic calculation, why the observed flux of muons at sea level is evidence for special relativity.Show worked answer →
Non-relativistic prediction. In s a muon at travels:
m m.
This is far less than km, so essentially no muons should survive to sea level. The expected flux ratio would be .
Relativistic prediction. Lorentz factor:
.
Earth-frame lifetime: s.
Distance covered in this dilated lifetime: m km.
So in one dilated lifetime the muons travel km, comparable to the km distance. The expected flux ratio is .
Measurement: about of muons reach sea level, matching the relativistic prediction. The non-relativistic prediction is wrong by six orders of magnitude. Markers reward both calculations and a clear comparison with experiment.
2020 HSC3 marksExplain why GPS satellites must apply a daily clock correction of approximately 38 microseconds to operate correctly, identifying which parts of the correction come from special relativity and which from general relativity.Show worked answer →
A GPS satellite orbits at about km altitude at a speed of about km/s. Two relativistic effects shift its onboard clock relative to a clock at the Earth's surface:
Special relativity (time dilation due to motion): the satellite's clock runs slow as seen from the ground because the satellite is moving. The shift is:
,
which is about s per day (the clock loses time).
General relativity (gravitational time dilation): a clock at high altitude in a weaker gravitational potential ticks faster than a clock at the surface. The shift is:
,
which is about s per day (the clock gains time).
Net effect: s per day faster than ground clocks. Without applying this correction, GPS positions would drift by about km per day (since light travels m per ns). The correction is hard-coded into the satellite oscillator frequencies before launch.
Markers reward identifying both effects with correct signs, the net magnitude, and the consequence for position accuracy.
Related dot points
- Analyse the Michelson-Morley experiment, state Einstein's two postulates of special relativity, and apply the consequences of time dilation, length contraction and relativity of simultaneity
A focused answer to the HSC Physics Module 7 dot point on light and special relativity. The Michelson-Morley null result, Einstein's two postulates, and quantitative application of time dilation t = gamma t_0, length contraction L = L_0 / gamma and relativity of simultaneity.
- Derive and apply the mass-energy equivalence E = mc^2, including the calculation of mass defect and binding energy in nuclear reactions
A focused answer to the HSC Physics Module 7 dot point on mass-energy equivalence. The total relativistic energy E = gamma m c^2, the rest energy E_0 = mc^2, mass defect Delta m in nuclear binding, and worked examples for fission, fusion and the deuteron binding energy.
- Compare classical and relativistic momentum, derive p = gamma m v, and analyse the role of relativistic momentum in particle accelerators
A focused answer to the HSC Physics Module 7 dot point on relativistic momentum. Why p = mv fails near c, the relativistic form p = gamma m v, the relativistic energy-momentum relation E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2, and how this drives the design of particle accelerators.