Skip to main content

Exponential and logarithmic graphs: key features, transformations and inverse relationship

Syllabus dot point

“Sketch and interpret graphs of exponential and logarithmic functions, including transformations, and use the inverse relationship between them”

HSCMaths AdvancedYear 12: Functions14 min read

Quick answer

y=exy = e^x has asymptote y=0y = 0 and grows from positive values; y=ln⁡xy = \ln x is its reflection in y=xy = x with vertical asymptote x=0x = 0 and domain (0,∞)(0, \infty); transformations follow the general rules, and the inverse relationship lets you sketch one from the other.

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Exam-style questions
  4. Practice questions

What this dot point is asking

NESA wants you to recognise and sketch the graphs of y=exy = e^x and y=ln⁡xy = \ln x, including any transformed versions, and to use the inverse relationship between exponential and logarithmic functions to reason about their graphs.

Note

Think about a phone battery. When you switch it off it drains fast at first, then slower and slower, creeping towards empty but never quite dropping to a flat zero: that curving-then-levelling shape is exactly what an exponential graph does, and the level it hugs is called an asymptote. A logarithm is the same story told backwards. It answers "how long until the battery hits this level?", so its graph is the exponential's mirror image, flipped over the diagonal line y=xy = x. Because they undo each other, anything you know about one curve tells you the matching fact about the other: the point (0,1)(0, 1) on one becomes (1,0)(1, 0) on the other, and a flat left-right asymptote turns into a steep up-down one. A transformation just slides, stretches or flips that curve, and the trick is to keep track of where the level line and the key point end up.

The answer

y equals e to the x and y equals ln x reflected in y equals xTwo curves reflected in the dashed line y equals x. The exponential y equals e to the x passes through zero one with horizontal asymptote y equals zero. The logarithm y equals ln x passes through one zero with vertical asymptote x equals zero. Each is the mirror image of the other in y equals x.xyy = xy = eˣy = ln x(0, 1)(1, 0)y = ln x is y = eˣ reflected in y = x: the point (0, 1) maps to (1, 0).

The base graph y=exy = e^x:

  • Domain R\mathbb{R}, range (0,∞)(0, \infty). Always positive.
  • yy-intercept at (0,1)(0, 1).
  • No xx-intercept.
  • Strictly increasing for all xx.
  • Horizontal asymptote y=0y = 0 as x→−∞x \to -\infty. Grows without bound as x→∞x \to \infty.
  • Concave up everywhere.

For a general base a>0a > 0, a≠1a \neq 1:

  • y=axy = a^x has the same shape as y=exy = e^x if a>1a > 1, and is decreasing with horizontal asymptote y=0y = 0 as x→∞x \to \infty if 0<a<10 < a < 1.

The logarithmic graph

The base graph y=ln⁡xy = \ln x:

  • Domain (0,∞)(0, \infty), range R\mathbb{R}.
  • xx-intercept at (1,0)(1, 0).
  • No yy-intercept (vertical asymptote there).
  • Strictly increasing for all x>0x > 0.
  • Vertical asymptote x=0x = 0 as x→0+x \to 0^+. Grows without bound as x→∞x \to \infty (slowly).
  • Concave down everywhere.

The inverse relationship

ln⁡\ln is the inverse of exe^x on its domain:

ln⁡(ex)=x for all x∈R,eln⁡x=x for all x>0.\ln(e^x) = x \text{ for all } x \in \mathbb{R}, \qquad e^{\ln x} = x \text{ for all } x > 0.

Graphically, the graph of an inverse is the reflection of the original in the line y=xy = x. Swap the coordinates of every point: (0,1)(0, 1) on exe^x maps to (1,0)(1, 0) on ln⁡x\ln x. The horizontal asymptote y=0y = 0 on exe^x becomes the vertical asymptote x=0x = 0 on ln⁡x\ln x. Domain and range swap.

Key fact

y=exy = e^x and y=ln⁡xy = \ln x are inverse functions, so their graphs are reflections in y=xy = x. This forces a tidy mirror swap of every feature: exe^x has domain R\mathbb{R}, range (0,∞)(0, \infty), passes through (0,1)(0, 1), and has the horizontal asymptote y=0y = 0; ln⁡x\ln x has domain (0,∞)(0, \infty), range R\mathbb{R}, passes through (1,0)(1, 0), and has the vertical asymptote x=0x = 0. For a transformed exponential y=aeb(x−h)+ky = a e^{b(x-h)} + k the horizontal asymptote is always y=ky = k (the level it approaches); for a transformed log y=aln⁡(b(x−h))+ky = a\ln(b(x-h)) + k the vertical asymptote sits where the argument is zero, and the domain is exactly where the argument is positive.

Transformations of exe^x

Apply the general transformation rules. For y=aeb(x−h)+ky = a e^{b(x - h)} + k:

  • hh shifts horizontally, kk shifts vertically (and changes the asymptote to y=ky = k).
  • aa stretches vertically and may reflect in the xx-axis if a<0a < 0.
  • bb controls horizontal compression and may reflect in the yy-axis if b<0b < 0.

The horizontal asymptote is always y=ky = k (the level the exponential approaches in the limit).

Transformations of ln⁡x\ln x

For y=aln⁡(b(x−h))+ky = a \ln(b(x - h)) + k:

  • hh shifts horizontally and moves the vertical asymptote to x=hx = h (provided b>0b > 0; in general the asymptote is at the value of xx that makes the argument zero).
  • aa stretches vertically; if a<0a < 0, reflects.
  • kk shifts vertically.

The domain is restricted to where the argument is positive: b(x−h)>0b(x - h) > 0.

Some specific shapes

  • y=e−xy = e^{-x}: reflection of exe^x in the yy-axis. Decreasing, asymptote y=0y = 0, through (0,1)(0, 1).
  • y=−exy = -e^x: reflection of exe^x in the xx-axis. Decreasing (in absolute height it grows), asymptote y=0y = 0 from below, through (0,−1)(0, -1).
  • y=ln⁡(−x)y = \ln(-x): reflection of ln⁡x\ln x in the yy-axis. Domain (−∞,0)(-\infty, 0), xx-intercept at (−1,0)(-1, 0), vertical asymptote x=0x = 0.
  • y=ln⁡∣x∣y = \ln|x|: defined for all x≠0x \neq 0. Symmetric about the yy-axis, vertical asymptote at x=0x = 0, xx-intercepts at x=±1x = \pm 1.

Sketch a transformed exponential, stage by stage

A typical HSC-style question asks for a sketch of y=2ex−4y = 2e^x - 4 with its asymptote and intercepts marked; the same method handles any transformed exponential. Below, y=3−ex−1y = 3 - e^{x - 1} is built from y=exy = e^x one transformation at a time, tracking how the asymptote and a key point move at each step. This is the worked Step 1 below, drawn out.

Stage 1, start from the base curve. Draw y=exy = e^x: increasing, always positive, through (0,1)(0, 1), with the horizontal asymptote y=0y = 0 (the xx-axis itself). Every later curve is this one moved or flipped.

Base exponential y equals e to the xThe base curve y equals e to the x, passing through zero one with horizontal asymptote y equals zero, the x-axis.xy13y = eˣ(0, 1)Stage 1Base curve y = eˣ. Through (0, 1); asymptote y = 0 (the x-axis); increasing.

Stage 2, shift right by 1. The exponent x−1x - 1 acts inside, so it shifts the curve right by 11. The point (0,1)(0, 1) moves to (1,1)(1, 1). The asymptote is unaffected by a horizontal shift, so it stays at y=0y = 0.

Shift right by oneThe curve y equals e to the x minus one, the base curve shifted right by one, passing through one one. The dashed curve is the base exponential.xy13y = eˣ⁻¹(1, 1)Stage 2Shift right by 1: y = eˣ⁻¹. Now through (1, 1); asymptote still y = 0.

Stage 3, reflect in the x-axis. The minus sign in −ex−1-e^{x-1} acts outside, flipping the curve top-to-bottom. It is now decreasing and lies below the xx-axis, passing through (1,−1)(1, -1). The asymptote is still y=0y = 0, but the curve now approaches it from below.

Reflect in the x-axisThe curve y equals minus e to the x minus one, the previous curve reflected in the x-axis, passing through one minus one. The dashed curve is the previous stage.xy13y = -eˣ⁻¹(1, -1)Stage 3Reflect in the x-axis: y = -eˣ⁻¹. Through (1, -1); now decreasing.

Stage 4, shift up by 3. Adding 33 acts outside, lifting the whole curve up by 33. The asymptote rises with it from y=0y = 0 to y=3y = 3. Now read off the intercepts: the yy-intercept is 3−e−1≈2.633 - e^{-1} \approx 2.63, and the xx-intercept solves ex−1=3e^{x-1} = 3, giving x=1+ln⁡3≈2.10x = 1 + \ln 3 \approx 2.10. The finished curve y=3−ex−1y = 3 - e^{x-1} is decreasing, sits below y=3y = 3, and crosses both axes.

Shift up by three, the finished curveThe finished curve y equals three minus e to the x minus one, with horizontal asymptote y equals three, y-intercept at zero comma three minus e to the minus one, and x-intercept at one plus ln three comma zero.xyy = 31y = 3 - eˣ⁻¹(1 + ln 3, 0)(0, 3 - e⁻¹)Stage 4Shift up by 3: y = 3 - eˣ⁻¹. Asymptote lifts to y = 3.

How exam questions ask about exponential and logarithmic graphs

The phrasings recur; map each to the move:

  • "Sketch y=aeb(x−h)+ky = a e^{b(x-h)} + k, marking the asymptote, the yy-intercept and any xx-intercept." Asymptote is y=ky = k; yy-intercept from x=0x = 0; xx-intercept from setting y=0y = 0 and solving for xx with a logarithm. Mark all three.
  • "State the domain of y=aln⁡(b(x−h))+ky = a\ln(b(x-h)) + k" or "find the vertical asymptote." Solve "argument >0> 0" for the domain; the asymptote is the boundary value of xx where the argument is zero.
  • "Explain why y=exy = e^x and y=ln⁡xy = \ln x are reflections in y=xy = x." State that ln⁡\ln is the inverse of exe^x, and an inverse graph is the reflection of the original in y=xy = x.
  • "Find the equation of the inverse of [an exponential]" or "[a logarithm]." Swap xx and yy, then isolate using ln⁡\ln or ee; the asymptote and domain swap type (horizontal becomes vertical).
  • "Solve ex=…e^x = \ldots or ln⁡x=…\ln x = \ldots from a graph", or "find where the curve cuts an axis." Use ln⁡\ln to undo ee, and ee to undo ln⁡\ln; give exact values like ln⁡2\ln 2 unless a decimal is asked for.
  • "Sketch y=e−xy = e^{-x} / −ex-e^x / ln⁡(−x)\ln(-x) / ln⁡∣x∣\ln|x|." Each is a single reflection of the base curve; name the axis of reflection and the new domain or asymptote.
Worked example

Four examples building from transformation steps to domain analysis, the inverse relationship between exponential and logarithmic graphs, and a real cooling model set in an Australian kitchen.

Build a shifted exponential step by step

To sketch y=3−ex−1y = 3 - e^{x-1}, apply the transformations one at a time to track how the asymptote and intercepts move.

Start with y=exy = e^x (asymptote y=0y = 0, through (0,1)(0, 1), increasing). Shift right by 11: y=ex−1y = e^{x-1} (asymptote still y=0y = 0, now through (1,1)(1, 1)). Reflect in the xx-axis: y=−ex−1y = -e^{x-1} (now decreasing, through (1,−1)(1, -1)). Shift up by 33: y=3−ex−1y = 3 - e^{x-1} (asymptote lifts to y=3y = 3).

Now read off key features. As x→−∞x \to -\infty, ex−1→0e^{x-1} \to 0, so y→3y \to 3: the horizontal asymptote is y=3y = 3.

yy-intercept (set x=0x = 0): y=3−e−1≈2.632y = 3 - e^{-1} \approx 2.632.

xx-intercept (set y=0y = 0): ex−1=3e^{x-1} = 3, so x−1=ln⁡3x - 1 = \ln 3 and x=1+ln⁡3≈2.099x = 1 + \ln 3 \approx 2.099.

The graph is decreasing for all xx (the negative in front of ex−1e^{x-1} reverses the increasing nature of the exponential).

Find the domain and vertical asymptote of a shifted logarithm

For y=ln⁡(2x−6)+1y = \ln(2x - 6) + 1, the logarithm is only defined when its argument is strictly positive. Solve the inequality to find the domain:

2x−6>0  ⟹  x>3.Domain: (3,∞).2x - 6 > 0 \implies x > 3. \qquad \text{Domain: } (3, \infty).

The vertical asymptote occurs at the boundary of the domain, where the argument equals zero: x=3x = 3.

To find the xx-intercept, set y=0y = 0: ln⁡(2x−6)=−1\ln(2x - 6) = -1, so 2x−6=e−12x - 6 = e^{-1} and x=3+12e≈3.184x = 3 + \frac{1}{2e} \approx 3.184.

Use the inverse relationship to find the equation and asymptote of the inverse graph

The inverse of y=ex−1+2y = e^{x-1} + 2 is found by swapping xx and yy and solving for yy.

x=ey−1+2  ⟹  ey−1=x−2  ⟹  y−1=ln⁡(x−2)  ⟹  y=1+ln⁡(x−2).x = e^{y-1} + 2 \implies e^{y-1} = x - 2 \implies y - 1 = \ln(x - 2) \implies y = 1 + \ln(x - 2).

The domain of the inverse is (2,∞)(2, \infty), with vertical asymptote x=2x = 2. This is exactly what the inverse relationship predicts: the horizontal asymptote of the original (y=2y = 2) becomes the vertical asymptote of the inverse (x=2x = 2), and domain and range swap.

Read a cooling curve in an Australian kitchen

A cup of tea made in a 22∘C22^\circ\text{C} Brisbane kitchen cools according to T(t)=22+68e−0.05tT(t) = 22 + 68 e^{-0.05 t}, where TT is in degrees Celsius and tt is minutes after pouring. Identify the graph's features and find when the tea reaches 40∘C40^\circ\text{C}.

The shape is a falling exponential added to a constant. As t→∞t \to \infty, e−0.05t→0e^{-0.05t} \to 0, so T→22T \to 22: the horizontal asymptote is y=22y = 22, the room temperature the tea settles to. The starting temperature is T(0)=22+68=90∘CT(0) = 22 + 68 = 90^\circ\text{C}, the yy-intercept. There is no xx-intercept, because T>22T > 22 for all tt (the tea never gets colder than the room).

To find when T=40T = 40, set 22+68e−0.05t=4022 + 68 e^{-0.05t} = 40, so e−0.05t=1868=934e^{-0.05t} = \frac{18}{68} = \frac{9}{34}. Take the natural log:

−0.05t=ln⁡ ⁣934  ⟹  t=ln⁡(9/34)−0.05≈26.6 minutes.-0.05 t = \ln\!\frac{9}{34} \implies t = \frac{\ln(9/34)}{-0.05} \approx 26.6 \text{ minutes}.

So the tea is drinkable at about 40∘C40^\circ\text{C} after roughly 2727 minutes. Notice the structure: T(t)=22+68e−0.05tT(t) = 22 + 68e^{-0.05t} is y=exy = e^x reflected in the yy-axis (the −0.05t-0.05t), vertically stretched by 6868, and shifted up by 2222, with asymptote y=22y = 22.

Final answers: y=3−ex−1y = 3 - e^{x-1} has asymptote y=3y = 3, xx-intercept 1+ln⁡31 + \ln 3, yy-intercept 3−e−13 - e^{-1}; y=ln⁡(2x−6)+1y = \ln(2x-6)+1 has domain (3,∞)(3, \infty); inverse of y=ex−1+2y = e^{x-1}+2 is y=1+ln⁡(x−2)y = 1 + \ln(x-2) with asymptote x=2x = 2; the tea reaches 40∘C40^\circ\text{C} after about 26.626.6 minutes.

Common traps
Wrong asymptote on a shifted exponential
y=aex+ky = a e^x + k has asymptote y=ky = k, not y=0y = 0. The horizontal asymptote moves with the vertical shift.
Missing domain restriction on ln⁡\ln
ln⁡(negative)=\ln(\text{negative}) = undefined. Always solve "argument >0> 0" before sketching.
Confusing ln⁡x\ln x with log⁡10x\log_{10} x
In Maths Advanced, ln⁡\ln means natural log (base ee) and log⁡\log usually also means base 1010. Be careful when reading the question.
Forgetting exe^x never reaches 00
y=ex>0y = e^x > 0 for every real xx. The asymptote y=0y = 0 is approached, not crossed.
Sketching ln⁡x\ln x as a power curve
ln⁡\ln grows slowly, slower than any positive power of xx. It also has unbounded negative values near x=0x = 0, not a finite minimum.
Exam technique

A "sketch the graph" question is really a checklist; the marks are attached to specific features.

  • Find the asymptote first, and draw it dashed. For y=aeb(x−h)+ky = a e^{b(x-h)} + k it is y=ky = k; for y=aln⁡(b(x−h))+ky = a\ln(b(x-h)) + k it is the vertical line where the argument is zero. The asymptote anchors the whole sketch.
  • Compute both intercepts and show the working. yy-intercept: substitute x=0x = 0. xx-intercept: set y=0y = 0 and solve with ln⁡\ln or ee. Give exact values (ln⁡2\ln 2, 1+ln⁡31 + \ln 3) unless a decimal is requested.
  • State the domain for any logarithm. Solve "argument >0> 0"; this is often worth its own mark and tells you where to start the curve.
  • Get the long-term direction right. Show the curve hugging its asymptote on the correct side (an exponential approaches y=ky = k from above if a>0a > 0, from below if a<0a < 0).
  • Label the curve and the key points. A correctly shaped but unlabelled curve loses the feature marks; write the intercept coordinates and the asymptote equation on the diagram.
  • Use the inverse link when it saves work. If you can sketch the exponential, the matching logarithm is its reflection in y=xy = x, and vice versa.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

HSC-style3 marks
Sketch the graph of y=2ex−4y = 2 e^{x} - 4, marking the yy-intercept, any xx-intercepts, and the horizontal asymptote.
Show worked answer →

Start with y=exy = e^x (asymptote y=0y = 0, through (0,1)(0, 1), increasing).

Vertical stretch by 22: y=2exy = 2 e^x (asymptote y=0y = 0, through (0,2)(0, 2)).

Vertical shift down by 44: y=2ex−4y = 2 e^x - 4 (asymptote y=−4y = -4, through (0,−2)(0, -2)).

xx-intercept: 2ex=42 e^x = 4, so ex=2e^x = 2 and x=ln⁡2≈0.693x = \ln 2 \approx 0.693.

yy-intercept: (0,−2)(0, -2).

Markers reward the correct asymptote at y=−4y = -4, the yy-intercept at (0,−2)(0, -2), the xx-intercept at x=ln⁡2x = \ln 2, and a smooth increasing curve.

HSC-style3 marks
Explain why the graphs of y=exy = e^x and y=ln⁡xy = \ln x are reflections of each other in the line y=xy = x, and state the asymptote of each.
Show worked answer →

ln⁡\ln is the inverse function of exe^x, so ln⁡(ex)=x\ln(e^x) = x and eln⁡x=xe^{\ln x} = x (the second only for x>0x > 0).

The graph of an inverse function is the reflection of the original in y=xy = x, swapping the xx and yy axes.

y=exy = e^x has horizontal asymptote y=0y = 0 (as x→−∞x \to -\infty), domain R\mathbb{R}, range (0,∞)(0, \infty).

y=ln⁡xy = \ln x has vertical asymptote x=0x = 0 (as x→0+x \to 0^+), domain (0,∞)(0, \infty), range R\mathbb{R}.

Markers expect the inverse-function statement, the reflection-in-y=xy = x fact, and accurate asymptotes and domains.

Practice questions

Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.

foundation2 marks
State the domain, range and equation of the horizontal asymptote of y=ex+3y = e^{x} + 3.
Show worked solution →

Read the transformation. The curve is y=exy = e^x shifted up by 33; the shape and domain are unchanged, but every yy-value is 33 larger.

Domain. An exponential is defined for every real input, so the domain is all real xx:

Domain: R.\text{Domain: } \mathbb{R}.

Asymptote and range. As x→−∞x \to -\infty, ex→0e^x \to 0, so y→3y \to 3: the horizontal asymptote is y=3y = 3. Since ex>0e^x > 0 always, y=ex+3>3y = e^x + 3 > 3, giving

Range: (3,∞),asymptote: y=3.\text{Range: } (3, \infty), \qquad \text{asymptote: } y = 3.

Marker's note: one mark for the domain R\mathbb{R}, one for the asymptote y=3y = 3 with range (3,∞)(3, \infty). Writing the range as [3,∞)[3, \infty) (including 33) is the common slip; the curve approaches y=3y = 3 but never reaches it.

foundation2 marks
Find the exact coordinates of the xx-intercept of y=ln⁡(x−2)y = \ln(x - 2) and state the equation of its vertical asymptote.
Show worked solution →

xx-intercept: set y=0y = 0. The log is zero when its argument is 11:

ln⁡(x−2)=0  ⟹  x−2=1  ⟹  x=3.\ln(x - 2) = 0 \implies x - 2 = 1 \implies x = 3.

So the xx-intercept is (3,0)(3, 0).

Vertical asymptote: the argument is zero at the domain edge.

x−2=0  ⟹  x=2.x - 2 = 0 \implies x = 2.

The vertical asymptote is x=2x = 2, and the domain is x>2x > 2.

Marker's note: one mark for the intercept (3,0)(3, 0) from ln⁡1=0\ln 1 = 0, one for the asymptote x=2x = 2. Solving ln⁡(x−2)=0\ln(x-2)=0 as x−2=0x - 2 = 0 (confusing ln⁡1=0\ln 1 = 0 with argument =0= 0) is the trap.

foundation3 marks
Find the equation of the inverse function of y=e2xy = e^{2x}, and state the domain of the inverse.
Show worked solution →

Swap xx and yy. The inverse reflects the graph in y=xy = x, which algebraically swaps the variables:

x=e2y.x = e^{2y}.

Solve for yy using the natural log. Take ln⁡\ln of both sides:

ln⁡x=2y  ⟹  y=12ln⁡x.\ln x = 2y \implies y = \tfrac{1}{2}\ln x.

Domain of the inverse. The original y=e2xy = e^{2x} has range (0,∞)(0, \infty), and the domain of the inverse equals the range of the original:

Domain: (0,∞).\text{Domain: } (0, \infty).

Marker's note: one mark for swapping to x=e2yx = e^{2y}, one for isolating y=12ln⁡xy = \tfrac{1}{2}\ln x, one for the domain (0,∞)(0, \infty). Forgetting the factor 12\tfrac{1}{2} (writing y=ln⁡xy = \ln x) drops the second mark.

core3 marks
Sketch y=ln⁡xy = \ln x and y=ln⁡x+2y = \ln x + 2 on the same axes. State how the second graph is obtained from the first, and give the exact xx-intercept of y=ln⁡x+2y = \ln x + 2.
Show worked solution →

Describe the transformation. Adding 22 acts outside the log, so y=ln⁡x+2y = \ln x + 2 is y=ln⁡xy = \ln x shifted up by 22. Both curves share the vertical asymptote x=0x = 0 and the domain (0,∞)(0, \infty); the shifted curve simply sits two units higher at every point.

xx-intercept of y=ln⁡x+2y = \ln x + 2: set y=0y = 0.

ln⁡x+2=0  ⟹  ln⁡x=−2  ⟹  x=e−2.\ln x + 2 = 0 \implies \ln x = -2 \implies x = e^{-2}.

So the intercept is (e−2,0)(e^{-2}, 0), which lies to the left of the original curve's intercept at (1,0)(1, 0), consistent with lifting the curve up.

Marker's note: one mark for naming the vertical shift up by 22, one for setting y=0y = 0, one for the exact intercept x=e−2x = e^{-2}. Leaving the answer as a decimal without the exact e−2e^{-2} form, or giving x=−2x = -2, loses the final mark.

core4 marks
The graph of y=Aekxy = A e^{kx} passes through the points (0,5)(0, 5) and (2,45)(2, 45), where AA and kk are constants. Find the exact values of AA and kk, and state the equation of the horizontal asymptote.
Show worked solution →

Use the first point to find AA. Substitute (0,5)(0, 5):

5=Ae0=A  ⟹  A=5.5 = A e^{0} = A \implies A = 5.

Use the second point to find kk. Substitute (2,45)(2, 45) with A=5A = 5:

45=5e2k  ⟹  e2k=9.45 = 5 e^{2k} \implies e^{2k} = 9.

Take the natural log of both sides:

2k=ln⁡9  ⟹  k=12ln⁡9=ln⁡3,2k = \ln 9 \implies k = \tfrac{1}{2}\ln 9 = \ln 3,

using ln⁡9=ln⁡32=2ln⁡3\ln 9 = \ln 3^2 = 2\ln 3.

Asymptote. With no vertical shift, y=5ekx→0y = 5 e^{kx} \to 0 as x→−∞x \to -\infty, so the horizontal asymptote is y=0y = 0.

Marker's note: one mark for A=5A = 5, one for reaching e2k=9e^{2k} = 9, one for k=ln⁡3k = \ln 3 (accept 12ln⁡9\tfrac{1}{2}\ln 9), one for the asymptote y=0y = 0. Not simplifying 12ln⁡9\tfrac{1}{2}\ln 9 to ln⁡3\ln 3 is fine; writing k=ln⁡9k = \ln 9 (forgetting to halve) is the error.

exam5 marks
An illustrative ExamExplained data set records a cup of coffee cooling in a 20∘C20^\circ\text{C} room. The temperature TT in degrees Celsius is plotted against time tt in minutes as a smooth curve that starts at 85∘C85^\circ\text{C} when t=0t = 0, falls steeply at first, then flattens and levels off just above the gridline T=20T = 20 as tt grows large, never crossing it. The curve has the form T=20+Ae−ktT = 20 + A e^{-kt}. (a) Use the graph to state the horizontal asymptote and the value of AA. (b) Given the curve passes through (10,45)(10, 45), find kk in exact form. (c) Hence find the exact time at which the coffee reaches 30∘C30^\circ\text{C}.
Show worked solution →

Part (a): read the level-off line and the start value. The curve flattens towards T=20T = 20, so the horizontal asymptote is

T=20.T = 20.

At t=0t = 0 the graph starts at 8585, and T(0)=20+Ae0=20+AT(0) = 20 + A e^{0} = 20 + A, so

20+A=85  ⟹  A=65.20 + A = 85 \implies A = 65.

Part (b): substitute the point (10,45)(10, 45). With A=65A = 65:

45=20+65e−10k  ⟹  65e−10k=25  ⟹  e−10k=2565=513.45 = 20 + 65 e^{-10k} \implies 65 e^{-10k} = 25 \implies e^{-10k} = \frac{25}{65} = \frac{5}{13}.

Take the natural log:

−10k=ln⁡ ⁣513  ⟹  k=−110ln⁡ ⁣513=110ln⁡ ⁣135.-10k = \ln\!\frac{5}{13} \implies k = -\frac{1}{10}\ln\!\frac{5}{13} = \frac{1}{10}\ln\!\frac{13}{5}.

Part (c): set T=30T = 30 and solve for tt. Using A=65A = 65:

30=20+65e−kt  ⟹  65e−kt=10  ⟹  e−kt=1065=213.30 = 20 + 65 e^{-kt} \implies 65 e^{-kt} = 10 \implies e^{-kt} = \frac{10}{65} = \frac{2}{13}.

Take the natural log, then divide by −k-k:

−kt=ln⁡ ⁣213  ⟹  t=ln⁡(2/13)−k=ln⁡(13/2)k.-kt = \ln\!\frac{2}{13} \implies t = \frac{\ln(2/13)}{-k} = \frac{\ln(13/2)}{k}.

Substituting k=110ln⁡135k = \tfrac{1}{10}\ln\tfrac{13}{5} gives the exact time

t=ln⁡(13/2)110ln⁡(13/5)=10ln⁡(13/2)ln⁡(13/5) minutes.t = \frac{\ln(13/2)}{\tfrac{1}{10}\ln(13/5)} = \frac{10\ln(13/2)}{\ln(13/5)} \text{ minutes}.

Marker's note: one mark for the asymptote T=20T = 20 and A=65A = 65 in (a); one for reaching e−10k=513e^{-10k} = \tfrac{5}{13} and one for k=110ln⁡135k = \tfrac{1}{10}\ln\tfrac{13}{5} in (b); one for setting T=30T = 30 to reach e−kt=213e^{-kt} = \tfrac{2}{13} and one for the exact t=10ln⁡(13/2)ln⁡(13/5)t = \tfrac{10\ln(13/2)}{\ln(13/5)} in (c). Substituting a rounded kk before the final line, when an exact answer is asked, costs the last mark.

exam5 marks
Consider f(x)=ln⁡(2x+6)f(x) = \ln(2x + 6). (a) State the domain of ff and the equation of its vertical asymptote. (b) Find the exact coordinates of the points where the graph of ff meets the coordinate axes. (c) Show that the inverse function is f−1(x)=12ex−3f^{-1}(x) = \tfrac{1}{2}e^{x} - 3, and hence state the equation of the horizontal asymptote of y=f−1(x)y = f^{-1}(x).
Show worked solution →

Part (a): domain and vertical asymptote. The log needs a positive argument:

2x+6>0  ⟹  x>−3,Domain: (−3,∞).2x + 6 > 0 \implies x > -3, \qquad \text{Domain: } (-3, \infty).

The boundary where the argument is zero gives the vertical asymptote x=−3x = -3.

Part (b): axis intercepts. For the yy-intercept, set x=0x = 0:

f(0)=ln⁡(6),so (0,ln⁡6).f(0) = \ln(6), \qquad \text{so } (0, \ln 6).

For the xx-intercept, set f(x)=0f(x) = 0, so the argument must equal 11:

ln⁡(2x+6)=0  ⟹  2x+6=1  ⟹  x=−52,so (−52,0).\ln(2x + 6) = 0 \implies 2x + 6 = 1 \implies x = -\tfrac{5}{2}, \qquad \text{so } \left(-\tfrac{5}{2}, 0\right).

Part (c): find and confirm the inverse. Write y=ln⁡(2x+6)y = \ln(2x + 6) and swap xx and yy:

x=ln⁡(2y+6).x = \ln(2y + 6).

Exponentiate both sides to undo the log:

ex=2y+6  ⟹  2y=ex−6  ⟹  y=12ex−3.e^{x} = 2y + 6 \implies 2y = e^{x} - 6 \implies y = \tfrac{1}{2}e^{x} - 3.

Hence f−1(x)=12ex−3f^{-1}(x) = \tfrac{1}{2}e^{x} - 3, as required. As x→−∞x \to -\infty, ex→0e^{x} \to 0, so f−1(x)→−3f^{-1}(x) \to -3: the horizontal asymptote is y=−3y = -3. This matches the inverse relationship, since the vertical asymptote x=−3x = -3 of ff becomes the horizontal asymptote y=−3y = -3 of f−1f^{-1}.

Marker's note: one mark for the domain and asymptote in (a); one for each intercept (0,ln⁡6)(0, \ln 6) and (−52,0)(-\tfrac{5}{2}, 0) in (b); one for the algebra swapping and exponentiating to the shown inverse, and one for the asymptote y=−3y = -3 with the domain-range-swap justification in (c). Skipping the "swap then exponentiate" steps and simply asserting the inverse forfeits the (c) working mark on a "show that".

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained