How do students plan, conduct and present an Independent Research Project?
The Independent Research Project (IRP): selecting a topic and research question, planning, conducting research ethically, analysing and presenting findings, and evaluating the process
A focused answer to the HSC Community and Family Studies dot point on the Independent Research Project. Covers choosing a topic and research question, planning, ethical research practice, analysis, presentation and evaluation of the IRP.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
The Independent Research Project (IRP) is the centrepiece of the Research Methodology core. You need to understand each stage of the research process: choosing a topic and writing a focused research question, planning and managing the project, conducting research ethically, analysing data, presenting findings, and evaluating both the findings and the process. The IRP is your own original work and may form part of internal HSC assessment.
Choosing a topic and research question
The topic must connect to CAFS course content, such as wellbeing, parenting, caring, groups in context or the social impact of technology, and should reflect a genuine area of interest because the project runs across most of the HSC year. A common strong move is to narrow a broad interest into a specific, answerable research question. "Technology and families" is too broad; "How does smartphone use at the dinner table affect family communication in households with teenagers?" is focused, manageable and researchable. A good research question is clear, specific, ethical, and realistic given the time and resources available.
Planning
Planning turns the question into a workable project. This includes selecting an appropriate research method (questionnaire, interview, observation, case study or a combination), identifying the target population and sample, drafting a timeline with milestones, and conducting a literature review of existing sources such as the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the Australian Institute of Family Studies and reputable secondary sources. Planning also means anticipating problems, for example low survey response rates, and building in contingency.
Conducting research ethically
Ethical research protects participants and ensures integrity. Key principles include informed consent (participants understand the purpose and agree to take part), confidentiality and anonymity, the right to withdraw, and avoiding harm. Extra care applies when researching vulnerable groups such as children, people with disability or families in crisis. Honesty in collecting and reporting data, and acknowledging all sources to avoid plagiarism, are also ethical requirements. Bias must be minimised through neutral wording and representative sampling.
Analysing and presenting findings
Analysis turns raw data into meaning. Quantitative data (numbers from closed questions) can be presented in tables, graphs and percentages and analysed for trends. Qualitative data (words from interviews or open questions) is analysed by identifying themes and patterns. Findings should be linked back to the research question and to the literature reviewed, noting where results agree or differ.
Presentation can take several forms: a written report, an oral presentation, a multimedia product or a combination. Whatever the format, findings should be communicated clearly, supported by evidence, and structured logically with an introduction, methodology, findings, discussion and conclusion.
Evaluating the process
Evaluation is reflection on both the findings and how the research was conducted. Students assess the reliability and validity of their data, the appropriateness of the method, the representativeness of the sample, any bias that crept in, and what they would do differently. Honest evaluation, including acknowledging limitations such as a small sample, demonstrates strong research understanding and is rewarded in marking.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2025 HSC5 marksA diary entry from a student's Independent Research Project describes handing out a paper questionnaire to the Year 12 cohort during a year meeting: they ran out of copies, the verbal instructions were unclear and students were talking, so some students did not finish or were rushed, and the hospitality class was on an excursion. Justify steps that would address the research issue presented in the diary.Show worked answer →
A 5-mark "justify" answer should identify the issues and propose steps, giving reasons why each step fixes the problem.
The core issue is poor organisation that has reduced both the response rate and the validity and reliability of the data, and the absent hospitality class has biased the sample.
- Print enough copies (with spares) in advance. This ensures every participant can complete the questionnaire, increasing the sample size and response rate so the data better represents the cohort.
- Prepare clear written instructions and administer in a quiet, controlled setting. Standardised instructions and a calm environment reduce confusion and rushed answers, improving the reliability and validity of responses.
- Allow adequate, uninterrupted time. Giving students enough time prevents incomplete questionnaires and improves data quality.
- Reschedule or follow up the absent group. Surveying the hospitality class separately (for example on their return) restores a representative sample and reduces bias.
Each step targets a specific weakness in the diary and improves the trustworthiness of the IRP findings.