Skip to main content

Back to the full dot-point answer

QLDModern HistoryQuick questions

Unit 4: International experiences in the Modern World (The Cold War 1945 to 1991)

Quick questions on Nature and historiography of the Cold War: QCE Modern History Unit 4

9short Q&A pairs drawn directly from our worked dot-point answer. For full context and worked exam questions, read the parent dot-point page.

What is newer scholarship (post-1990s)?
Show answer
Access to Soviet, Eastern European and Chinese archives has refined post-revisionism:
What is thesis?
Show answer
The Cold War was caused primarily by Soviet expansionism. American policy was largely defensive.
What are key historians?
Show answer
Arthur Schlesinger Jr., Herbert Feis, Samuel Flagg Bemis.
What is argument?
Show answer
- Stalin's behaviour in Eastern Europe (failure to hold free elections, imposition of communist governments) violated the Yalta agreements. - The Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan were responses to Soviet expansionism, not provocations. - The USA was building international institutions (UN, IMF, Marshall Plan) consistent with liberal internationalism; the USSR was pursuing communist expansion.
What is context?
Show answer
The orthodox view dominated during the height of the Cold War itself. American academic culture supported a view that legitimated US policy. Soviet archives were inaccessible.
What are strengths?
Show answer
Soviet behaviour in Eastern Europe was demonstrably more aggressive than American behaviour in Western Europe. Stalin's Eastern European policy was incompatible with free elections.
What are weaknesses?
Show answer
Single-cause emphasis. Underplays American agency, especially atomic diplomacy and economic interests. Assumes American motives were transparent and benign.
What are anachronistic judgements?
Show answer
Critiquing 1950s historians for not knowing 1990s evidence is unfair.
What is single-school commitment?
Show answer
A response that fully endorses one school (especially orthodox or revisionist) without acknowledging the others reads as ideologically committed rather than historically critical.

All Modern HistoryQ&A pages