← Unit 3: Equilibrium, acids and redox reactions
Topic 1: Chemical equilibrium systems
Predict, using Le Chatelier's principle, the qualitative effects of changes in concentration, temperature, pressure and volume on the equilibrium position of homogeneous reactions
A focused answer to the QCE Chemistry Unit 3 dot point on Le Chatelier's principle. Defines the principle, works through how concentration, temperature, pressure and volume changes shift equilibrium position, explains why catalysts do not shift equilibrium, and applies the reasoning to the Haber process and the iron(III) thiocyanate system used in IA1 and IA2.
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
QCAA wants you to apply Le Chatelier's principle to predict the direction of equilibrium shifts under four kinds of disturbance (concentration, temperature, pressure or volume in gaseous systems) and to explain the predictions in terms of how the system opposes the change. The principle reappears in IA1 stimulus, IA2 experimental design (most IA2s involve perturbing equilibrium and observing the response), and the EA.
The answer
Le Chatelier's principle states: when a system at equilibrium is subjected to a change in conditions, the system will shift its equilibrium position in the direction that partially opposes the change.
A shift "to the right" favours product formation; a shift "to the left" favours reactant reformation. The four disturbances examinable in Unit 3 are concentration, temperature, total pressure (or volume) in gaseous systems, and the addition of a catalyst (which is a control case, not a shift).
Concentration changes
For any equilibrium A + B leftrightarrow C + D:
- Increase [A] or [B]. Forward rate rises (more reactant particles colliding). Shift right; [C] and [D] increase, [A] and [B] partially consumed.
- Decrease [A] or [B]. Forward rate falls. Shift left; [C] and [D] partially consumed.
- Increase [C] or [D]. Reverse rate rises. Shift left.
- Decrease [C] or [D]. Reverse rate falls. Shift right.
Important. The shift partially opposes the change. After re-equilibration the disturbed species does not return to its original value; only a fraction of the disturbance is undone. Kc is unchanged.
Temperature changes
Temperature is the only disturbance that actually changes Kc. Whether the equilibrium shifts forward or back depends on the thermicity of the forward reaction.
- Exothermic forward reaction (Delta H negative). Treat heat as a product. Increasing T adds product; shift left. Kc decreases.
- Endothermic forward reaction (Delta H positive). Treat heat as a reactant. Increasing T adds reactant; shift right. Kc increases.
The Haber process N2 + 3H2 leftrightarrow 2NH3 has Delta H = -92 kJ/mol (exothermic forward). Increasing T shifts left and decreases yield. This is why the industrial compromise sets temperature only as high as needed to keep the iron catalyst active.
Pressure and volume changes (gaseous systems only)
These two are linked: at constant temperature, decreasing volume increases pressure and vice versa. The shift direction depends on the relative moles of gas on each side of the equation.
For a gas-phase equilibrium with delta-n moles of gas:
- Increase pressure (decrease volume). Shift toward the side with fewer moles of gas.
- Decrease pressure (increase volume). Shift toward the side with more moles of gas.
- No moles-of-gas difference. No shift in equilibrium position.
For N2 + 3H2 leftrightarrow 2NH3: reactant side has 4 mol gas, product side has 2 mol gas. Increasing pressure favours the product side (fewer mol). This is why industrial Haber reactors operate at high pressure (250 atm).
For H2 + I2 leftrightarrow 2HI: 2 mol gas each side. Pressure change has no effect on position.
Adding an inert gas at constant volume. Total pressure rises but partial pressures of reacting species are unchanged. No shift.
Adding an inert gas at constant pressure. The container expands; partial pressures of reacting species fall. Equivalent to a volume increase; shift toward more moles of gas.
Catalysts
A catalyst speeds the forward and reverse reactions equally. The equilibrium position does not shift and Kc does not change. The system reaches equilibrium faster.
This is examined as a distractor: a stimulus showing equilibrium re-established at the same concentrations after catalyst addition is consistent with a catalyst having no shift effect.
Visualising the shifts
A useful approach is the "what would the system do to undo the change?" test:
- Added a reactant? The system consumes it -> shift right.
- Removed a product? The system replaces it -> shift right.
- Heated an exothermic forward reaction? The system absorbs heat -> shift left (endothermic direction).
- Compressed a gas system? The system reduces gas pressure -> shift toward fewer moles of gas.
Sample concentration-vs-time graph after a disturbance
A typical IA1 stimulus shows a system at equilibrium, then a sudden disturbance (e.g. extra reactant injected), then re-equilibration.
Key features to identify on such a graph:
- The first plateau before the disturbance: original equilibrium.
- The vertical step at the disturbance: a concentration spike (or drop) of the affected species.
- The adjustment curve following the step: the system responding (forward rate rises if reactant was added, etc.).
- The second plateau at the new equilibrium: different concentrations than before but consistent with the same Kc (unless T was changed).
Recognising these features under the criteria "interpretation of stimulus" is exactly what IA1 rewards.
Worked example: applying Le Chatelier in IA2
A common IA2 design uses the iron(III) thiocyanate system. The student designs perturbations and predicts then tests the colour change.
| Perturbation | Le Chatelier prediction | Observation |
|---|---|---|
| Add KSCN solution | Shift right (consumes added SCN-) | Solution deepens red |
| Add FeCl3 solution | Shift right (consumes added Fe3+) | Solution deepens red |
| Add NaOH solution | Shift left (OH- removes Fe3+ as Fe(OH)3) | Solution fades |
| Heat the tube (assume forward exothermic) | Shift left | Solution fades |
| Cool the tube | Shift right | Solution deepens |
In the IA2 report, the strongest students explicitly state the principle, predict before observing, and then justify the observation against the equilibrium expression. The criterion "claim, evidence, reasoning" rewards each component shown clearly.
Common traps
Saying "the system shifts to make the change go away". It only partially opposes; the affected species does not return to its original concentration.
Applying pressure logic to aqueous systems. Pressure changes affect only gases. The iron(III) thiocyanate equilibrium is aqueous; pressure has no effect.
Forgetting to count moles of gas carefully. Solids and liquids do not count. For 2SO2(g) + O2(g) leftrightarrow 2SO3(g), reactant side has 3 mol gas, product side has 2 mol gas; increasing pressure shifts right.
Confusing kinetics and thermodynamics. A catalyst affects how fast equilibrium is reached, not where it sits. Temperature is the only condition that changes Kc.
Treating heat as a thermal reservoir that absorbs without shifting. Heat is a participant in the equation; raising T shifts in the endothermic direction by adding energy as if it were a reactant or product.
In one sentence
Le Chatelier's principle predicts that a system at equilibrium shifts in the direction that partially opposes any change in concentration (shift away from added species), temperature (shift toward the endothermic side as T rises), or pressure in gaseous systems (shift toward fewer moles of gas as P rises), while catalysts speed both directions equally and do not change the position.
Past exam questions, worked
Real questions from past QCAA papers on this dot point, with our answer explainer.
2023 QCAA-style6 marksThe Haber process produces ammonia by the equilibrium reaction N2(g) + 3H2(g) <-> 2NH3(g), Delta H = -92 kJ/mol. Industrial reactors operate at approximately 450 degrees C and 250 atm with an iron catalyst, achieving around 15 percent conversion per pass. (a) Using Le Chatelier's principle, predict and explain the effect on equilibrium yield of (i) increasing pressure, (ii) increasing temperature. (b) Explain why the industrial conditions are a compromise rather than the ones that maximise equilibrium yield.Show worked answer →
A 6-mark answer needs both shifts explained with stoichiometry/thermodynamics, then the compromise argument.
(a)(i) Increasing pressure. The forward reaction has 4 mol of gas on the reactant side and 2 mol on the product side. Increasing total pressure (decreasing volume) favours the side with fewer moles of gas, so the equilibrium shifts right toward NH3. Yield of NH3 increases.
(a)(ii) Increasing temperature. The forward reaction is exothermic (Delta H = -92 kJ/mol). Increasing temperature adds energy; the system opposes the change by favouring the endothermic direction (reverse). Equilibrium shifts left, and yield of NH3 decreases.
(b) Why the compromise. Maximum equilibrium yield would suggest very high pressure (favours products) and very low temperature (favours products). But low temperature gives a very slow rate, so even though the yield is high, the time to reach equilibrium is impractical. Industrial conditions are chosen to give an economically acceptable rate at acceptable yield, supported by a catalyst (iron) that speeds attainment of equilibrium without shifting position. 250 atm is the upper bound where reactor cost remains viable; 450 degrees C is the lowest temperature at which the iron catalyst is still active. Unreacted gases are recycled.
Markers reward (1) correct shift direction with stoichiometric justification on pressure, (2) correct shift direction with enthalpy justification on temperature, (3) the rate/yield/cost trade-off explicit in the compromise answer.
2022 QCAA-style4 marksThe reaction Fe3+(aq) + SCN-(aq) <-> FeSCN2+(aq) was at equilibrium when 5 mL of 0.10 mol/L KSCN was added. (a) State the direction of the equilibrium shift. (b) Describe the colour change observed in the test tube. (c) Explain why the addition of solid KCl (potassium chloride) would have no effect on this equilibrium.Show worked answer →
A 4-mark answer needs the shift, the colour, and the spectator-ion explanation.
(a) Shift direction. Adding KSCN increases [SCN-]. The system opposes the increase by consuming SCN-, so the equilibrium shifts right toward more FeSCN2+.
(b) Colour change. [FeSCN2+] increases, so the solution becomes a deeper red.
(c) Why KCl has no effect. K+ and Cl- are spectator ions; neither appears in the equilibrium expression. K+ does not react with SCN- or with Fe3+, and Cl- does not react with Fe3+ at appreciable extent in this concentration range. Adding KCl does not change [Fe3+], [SCN-] or [FeSCN2+] and so the position of equilibrium is unchanged.
Markers reward shift direction, the corresponding colour deepening, and explicit spectator-ion reasoning rather than just "no effect".
Related dot points
- Explain dynamic equilibrium in terms of rates of forward and reverse reactions, and recognise that equilibrium can only be established in a closed system
A focused answer to the QCE Chemistry Unit 3 dot point on dynamic equilibrium. Defines reversible reactions, contrasts dynamic with static equilibrium, explains why equilibrium requires a closed system, and works through a sample concentration-vs-time graph with the kind of stimulus QCAA uses in IA1.
- Derive and apply the equilibrium law expression (Kc) for homogeneous reactions, including calculating Kc from equilibrium concentrations and predicting the position of equilibrium from the value of Kc
A focused answer to the QCE Chemistry Unit 3 dot point on the equilibrium constant. Sets out the equilibrium law expression, works through Kc calculation from a stimulus ICE table (the dominant IA1 question type), interprets the value of Kc in terms of extent, and addresses why Kc is temperature-dependent but pressure-independent.
- Describe acids and bases using the Bronsted-Lowry model, including the identification of conjugate acid-base pairs, amphiprotic species, and the distinction between strong and weak acids and bases
A focused answer to the QCE Chemistry Unit 3 dot point on Bronsted-Lowry acids and bases. Defines proton donors and acceptors, walks through conjugate acid-base pairs, identifies amphiprotic species (water, hydrogencarbonate, dihydrogenphosphate), and contrasts strong with weak acids and bases using Ka and Kb in equilibrium terms.