← Unit 1: Chemical fundamentals (structure, properties and reactions)
Topic 2: Properties and structure of materials
Identify the three classes of intermolecular force (dispersion forces, dipole-dipole forces, hydrogen bonding) and use them to explain the physical properties of covalent molecular substances (melting and boiling points, solubility, viscosity, surface tension)
A focused answer to the QCE Chemistry Unit 1 dot point on intermolecular forces. Distinguishes dispersion forces, dipole-dipole attractions, and hydrogen bonding by origin and relative strength, then uses them to explain melting and boiling points, solubility, viscosity and surface tension of covalent molecular substances.
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
QCAA wants you to identify the three types of intermolecular force (dispersion, dipole-dipole, hydrogen bonding), explain their origin and relative strength, and use them to predict and compare physical properties of covalent molecular substances (melting and boiling points, solubility, viscosity, surface tension). This dot point builds directly on the covalent bonding and polarity dot point.
The answer
Intermolecular forces are the attractions between separate molecules, not the bonds within them. They are significantly weaker than ionic, covalent or metallic bonds, but they govern the physical properties of all molecular substances. Three main types are required at QCE Chemistry Unit 1 level: dispersion forces, dipole-dipole attractions, and hydrogen bonding.
Three types of intermolecular force
Dispersion forces (also called London forces or instantaneous dipole-induced dipole forces). Present between all molecules, polar or non-polar. Caused by random fluctuations in electron density that create an instantaneous dipole; this induces a dipole in a neighbouring molecule; the two attract. Always present, but they are the only intermolecular force in non-polar substances.
Strength scales with:
- Number of electrons (larger, heavier molecules have more electrons and a more polarisable electron cloud, so stronger dispersion forces).
- Surface area / shape (long straight-chain molecules can stack closely, increasing dispersion; branched isomers cannot stack as well, so weaker dispersion).
Dipole-dipole attractions. Present in polar molecules. The delta+ end of one molecule attracts the delta- end of a neighbouring molecule. Stronger than dispersion forces of comparable mass, but typically weaker than hydrogen bonding.
Hydrogen bonding. A special, particularly strong dipole-dipole attraction that occurs when H is bonded directly to N, O or F (the three small, highly electronegative atoms). The H is so strongly delta+ that it attracts a lone pair on N, O or F of a neighbouring molecule. Roughly 5 to 10 times stronger than ordinary dipole-dipole attraction.
| Force | Where it operates | Typical strength | Key feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dispersion | All molecules | Very weak in small molecules, can be substantial in large | Scales with electron count and surface area |
| Dipole-dipole | Polar molecules | Weak to moderate | Acts in addition to dispersion |
| Hydrogen bonding | N-H, O-H, F-H groups | Moderate to strong (among intermolecular) | Donor H to acceptor lone pair on N, O or F |
Strength order in a single molecule of comparable size: hydrogen bonding > dipole-dipole > dispersion. But for very large non-polar molecules (long alkanes), dispersion can outweigh dipole-dipole in a small polar molecule.
Hydrogen bonding in detail
Three conditions must be met:
- A hydrogen atom covalently bonded to N, O or F (the donor).
- A lone pair on N, O or F in a neighbouring molecule (the acceptor).
- The donor and acceptor must be able to approach close enough (a few angstroms).
Common molecules with hydrogen bonding:
- Water (H_2O). Each O has 2 lone pairs and 2 O-H bonds, so it can participate in up to 4 hydrogen bonds. This is why water has anomalously high melting and boiling points compared with H_2S, H_2Se, H_2Te.
- Ammonia (NH_3). One lone pair on N, three N-H bonds. Average of 1 hydrogen bond per molecule.
- Hydrogen fluoride (HF). Three lone pairs on F, one H-F bond.
- Alcohols (R-OH).
- Amines (R-NH_2 or R_2-NH).
- Carboxylic acids (R-COOH). Strong hydrogen bonding, often dimeric.
C-H groups do not hydrogen bond in any meaningful sense at QCE Chemistry level: C is not electronegative enough to make the H delta+ enough.
Predicting physical properties
Melting point and boiling point. Higher with stronger intermolecular forces. The kinetic energy required to overcome the attractions is proportional to their strength. When comparing substances:
- Start with the relative molecular mass (dispersion-force proxy).
- Identify whether each substance is polar (dipole-dipole) and whether it has N-H, O-H or F-H (hydrogen bonding).
- The substance with the strongest combined intermolecular forces has the highest melting/boiling point.
Trends in homologous series (e.g. alkanes): boiling point increases with chain length, because dispersion forces increase with electron count. Branched isomers boil lower than straight-chain ones of the same formula because they have less surface area for dispersion to act over.
Solubility. "Like dissolves like". Polar solvents (water, ethanol) dissolve polar and ionic solutes; non-polar solvents (hexane, oil) dissolve non-polar solutes. The principle is that the solute-solvent interactions must be of comparable strength to the solute-solute and solvent-solvent interactions.
- Water dissolves NaCl: water solvates the ions via ion-dipole interactions, comparable to the lattice energy lost.
- Water dissolves ethanol completely: O-H of ethanol hydrogen-bonds with water.
- Water does not dissolve hexane: water-water hydrogen bonds are too strong to give up for weak dispersion interactions with hexane.
The alkanols (CH_3OH, C_2H_5OH, C_3H_7OH, ...) become progressively less soluble in water as the carbon chain grows because the non-polar tail begins to dominate.
Viscosity. Higher with stronger intermolecular forces (molecules resist sliding past each other). Glycerol (three O-H groups, extensive hydrogen bonding) is much more viscous than water; water is much more viscous than hexane (only dispersion).
Surface tension. Higher with stronger intermolecular forces (the surface molecules are pulled inward more strongly). Water has high surface tension because of hydrogen bonding; hence water beads up on a non-polar surface.
Vapour pressure. Lower with stronger intermolecular forces. Substances with strong intermolecular forces have fewer molecules escaping to the vapour phase at any given temperature.
Worked comparison: boiling points of the period-2 hydrides
| Compound | Hydride class | Dominant intermolecular force | Boiling point (degrees C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CH_4 | non-polar | Dispersion only | -161 |
| NH_3 | polar, N-H present | Dispersion + dipole-dipole + hydrogen bonding | -33 |
| H_2O | polar, O-H present | Dispersion + dipole-dipole + hydrogen bonding (very strong) | 100 |
| HF | polar, H-F present | Dispersion + dipole-dipole + hydrogen bonding | 20 |
Notice the periodic-table dip down to CH_4 and the spike at H_2O. Water boils higher than HF and NH_3 because each H_2O can engage in 4 hydrogen bonds on average, while HF has 1 H-F donor and NH_3 has 3 donors but only 1 acceptor lone pair.
Worked comparison: structural isomers
Pentane (n-C_5H_12, straight chain) versus 2,2-dimethylpropane (neopentane, branched). Same molar mass (72 g/mol), no polarity (both alkanes). Pentane boils at 36 degrees C; neopentane at 10 degrees C. Difference is dispersion-force surface area: straight chain has more contact between neighbouring molecules; branched, near-spherical neopentane has less.
This shape-driven dispersion argument is a frequent QCAA EA prompt.
Common traps
Calling intermolecular forces "bonds". They are attractions between molecules, not bonds within molecules. Reserve "bond" for ionic, covalent and metallic interactions.
Forgetting dispersion in polar molecules. Polar molecules have dispersion forces too. The total intermolecular force is the sum of all applicable types.
Inventing hydrogen bonding without N, O or F. HCl, H_2S, CHCl_3 do not have hydrogen bonding. They are polar (dipole-dipole) but the H is not bonded to N, O or F.
Mixing up intramolecular and intermolecular. Boiling water at 100 degrees C breaks intermolecular hydrogen bonds, not the O-H covalent bonds (which require around 460 kJ/mol, hundreds of times more energy).
Treating dispersion as negligible. For large molecules, dispersion can dominate. Iodine (I_2) is solid at room temperature with only dispersion forces; bromine (Br_2) is liquid; chlorine (Cl_2) is gas. Mass and electron count matter.
Using "like dissolves like" without naming the forces. The principle is descriptive; the explanation is intermolecular forces. Always name which forces are involved.
In one sentence
Intermolecular forces (dispersion, present in all molecules and scaling with electron count and surface area; dipole-dipole, in polar molecules; and hydrogen bonding, the strongest, when H is bonded to N, O or F) govern the physical properties of covalent molecular substances, with stronger combined forces giving higher melting and boiling points, higher viscosity and surface tension, lower vapour pressure, and the "like-dissolves-like" pattern in solubility.
Past exam questions, worked
Real questions from past QCAA papers on this dot point, with our answer explainer.
2024 QCAA-style4 marksBoiling points: CH_4 -161 degrees C; HCl -85 degrees C; H_2O 100 degrees C. (a) Identify the dominant intermolecular force in each substance. (b) Explain the trend in boiling points in terms of intermolecular forces.Show worked answer →
A 4-mark answer needs the force identification for each and the comparative reasoning.
(a) Dominant forces. CH_4: non-polar molecule (symmetric tetrahedral, weak C-H polarity cancels), so dispersion forces only. HCl: polar molecule (significant electronegativity difference, no symmetric cancellation), so dispersion forces plus dipole-dipole. H_2O: polar molecule with O-H bonds, so dispersion forces plus dipole-dipole plus hydrogen bonding.
(b) Trend. All three molecules have similar masses and sizes (16, 36, 18 g/mol), so dispersion contributions are roughly comparable. The boiling points reflect the additional intermolecular forces:
- CH_4 has only dispersion forces: very weak, low boiling point.
- HCl adds dipole-dipole attractions (HCl is polar): higher boiling point than CH_4.
- H_2O adds hydrogen bonding, the strongest of the three types: much higher boiling point despite being slightly smaller than HCl.
Hydrogen bonding requires H bonded to N, O or F. H_2O has two such bonds per molecule and two lone pairs on O, so each molecule can participate in up to four hydrogen bonds.
Markers reward correct identification of all three forces, explicit ranking of strengths, and clear use of the trend to justify the comparison.
2023 QCAA-style3 marksPredict, with reasoning, whether ethanol (CH_3CH_2OH) or methoxymethane/dimethyl ether (CH_3OCH_3) has the higher boiling point. The two compounds have the same molecular formula C_2H_6O.Show worked answer →
A 3-mark answer needs the structural distinction and the force consequence.
Both molecules are structural isomers of C_2H_6O with molar mass 46 g/mol, so dispersion forces are comparable.
Ethanol (CH_3CH_2OH) contains an O-H bond. Hydrogen bonded directly to oxygen can participate in hydrogen bonding with neighbouring molecules. Each ethanol molecule has one O-H donor and two lone pairs on O as acceptors.
Methoxymethane (CH_3OCH_3) has no O-H bond: oxygen is bonded only to carbon. There is no hydrogen-bond donor; the strongest intermolecular force is dipole-dipole.
Hydrogen bonding is significantly stronger than dipole-dipole, so ethanol has the higher boiling point.
Reference values: ethanol 78 degrees C, methoxymethane -24 degrees C. The 100-degree gap from a single structural difference is a classic QCAA illustration.
Markers reward the structural identification (O-H present or absent), the resulting force type, and the explicit ranking.
Related dot points
- Describe covalent bonding as the sharing of electron pairs between non-metal atoms, draw Lewis structures for simple molecules and polyatomic ions, predict molecular shape using VSEPR theory, and determine bond polarity and overall molecular polarity from electronegativity differences and geometry
A focused answer to the QCE Chemistry Unit 1 dot point on covalent bonding. Walks through drawing Lewis structures for molecules and polyatomic ions, predicts shapes (linear, bent, trigonal planar, trigonal pyramidal, tetrahedral) using VSEPR theory, and determines bond and overall molecular polarity from electronegativity differences and the symmetry of the structure.
- Describe ionic bonding as the electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions in a regular three-dimensional lattice, predict the formula of binary ionic compounds, and relate physical properties (melting point, electrical conductivity, brittleness, solubility) to lattice structure
A focused answer to the QCE Chemistry Unit 1 dot point on ionic bonding. Explains how electron transfer forms cations and anions held in a 3D lattice by electrostatic attraction, predicts formulae for binary ionic compounds, and links lattice structure to the high melting point, brittleness, conductivity only when molten or dissolved, and variable solubility of ionic substances.
- Describe electron configuration in terms of shells, subshells (s, p, d) and orbitals using the (1s 2s 2p 3s 3p 4s 3d 4p) filling order, and explain the periodic trends in atomic radius, first ionisation energy and electronegativity using effective nuclear charge and shielding
A focused answer to the QCE Chemistry Unit 1 dot point on electron configuration and periodic trends. Walks through the s, p and d subshell filling order using the aufbau principle, Pauli exclusion and Hund's rule, then explains atomic radius, first ionisation energy and electronegativity in terms of effective nuclear charge and shielding.