← Option: Improving Performance
What ethical issues are related to improving performance?
Use of drugs to enhance performance: types of performance-enhancing drugs (anabolic steroids, EPO, hGH, peptides, stimulants), the rationale for use, consequences (physical, social, legal), drug testing and the role of WADA, Sport Integrity Australia and ASADA
A focused answer to the HSC PDHPE Improving Performance dot point on drugs in sport. Types of PEDs (anabolic steroids, EPO, hGH, peptides, stimulants), rationale, consequences, and the anti-doping framework (WADA, Sport Integrity Australia).
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) have a long history in sport. The HSC syllabus expects you to know the main categories, why athletes use them, the consequences, and the anti-doping framework that responds to them.
Types of performance-enhancing drugs
Anabolic-androgenic steroids
Synthetic analogues of testosterone. Promote muscle growth, strength, and recovery. The most-known category.
- Effects
- Increased muscle mass, strength, recovery from training, aggressiveness.
- Side effects
- Cardiovascular damage (left ventricular hypertrophy, hypertension, increased cardiac event risk), liver damage (oral forms), hormonal disruption (testicular atrophy in men, masculinisation in women), psychological effects (mood swings, aggression, dependence).
- Use patterns
- Concentrated in strength and power sports historically. Significant use in recreational gym contexts in Australia (the AIHW estimates around 2-3% of Australian gym-goers have used anabolic steroids non-medically).
EPO (erythropoietin)
A hormone that stimulates red blood cell production. Synthetic EPO increases haematocrit, raising oxygen-carrying capacity.
- Effects
- Substantial improvement in aerobic capacity. Most useful for endurance sports.
- Side effects
- Increased blood viscosity raises stroke and heart attack risk. A wave of unexplained deaths in cyclists in the 1980s and 1990s was linked to EPO use.
- Use patterns
- Concentrated in endurance sports (cycling, distance running, distance swimming, triathlon). The Lance Armstrong case made EPO the canonical example of high-profile doping.
Human growth hormone (hGH)
A peptide hormone that stimulates growth, muscle development, and recovery. Synthesised forms are used both medically (in growth hormone deficiency) and as PEDs.
- Effects
- Increased muscle mass, faster recovery, possibly fat loss. Evidence of actual performance benefit is mixed - the marketing exceeds the science.
- Side effects
- Bone and tissue overgrowth (acromegaly in chronic users), diabetes, cardiovascular issues.
- Use patterns
- Across many sports, often in combination with steroids and other agents.
Peptides
A broad category of short protein sequences with various effects. Some stimulate growth hormone release, others stimulate IGF-1, others affect specific tissues.
The "Essendon supplements saga" (AFL, 2012-2015) was an Australian case involving alleged use of peptides at an AFL club, resulting in player suspensions and substantial governance reform. The case is a likely HSC exam reference point.
Stimulants
Drugs that increase alertness, energy, and reaction time. Includes amphetamines, methylphenidate, modafinil, and prescription stimulants used recreationally.
- Effects
- Increased aggression, energy, focus, reduced fatigue perception, improved reaction time.
- Side effects
- Cardiovascular stress, dependence, mental health effects (anxiety, paranoia, psychosis at high doses), heat illness risk.
- Use patterns
- Across many sports, particularly those with intense intermittent demands. Caffeine is the legal version and is used by most elite athletes; banned stimulants are the same effect at higher dose with more risk.
Other categories
- Beta-blockers. Reduce heart rate and tremor. Banned in precision sports (shooting, archery).
- Diuretics. Mask other drugs, support weight cutting. Banned across all sports.
- Blood doping (transfusion of own or donor blood). Effect similar to EPO. Detectable through the Athlete Biological Passport.
- Gene doping (theoretical use of gene therapy to enhance performance). Banned but detection is in its early stages.
Rationale for use
Athletes use PEDs for predictable reasons:
- Competitive pressure. "If others are doping, I have to dope to compete."
- Financial incentive. Elite sport pays substantially; doping seems rational if the expected benefit exceeds the expected punishment.
- Recovery from injury. Some athletes start with legitimate medical use and continue beyond clinical necessity.
- Peer and coach influence. Doping cultures within teams or training groups.
- Body image (in recreational contexts).
- Despair. Athletes whose careers are stalling sometimes view PEDs as a last option.
The cost-benefit calculation has shifted over time as anti-doping has tightened. Today the calculation includes substantial career risk.
Consequences
Physical
Covered per drug above. Generic patterns: cardiovascular stress, hormonal disruption, organ damage, dependence, increased injury risk in some cases (steroids can produce tendon weakness as muscle grows faster than connective tissue adapts).
Social
- Suspension or ban from sport. Loss of livelihood.
- Reputation damage. Even after a ban ends, the athlete's career is marked.
- Loss of sponsorships and earnings.
- Family and community relationship damage.
- Mental health consequences from public exposure and shame.
Legal
- WADA Code violations produce 4-year bans (or longer) for serious cases.
- Some PEDs are illegal to possess in Australia (Schedule 4 drugs require prescription; Schedule 8 and S9 drugs are restricted).
- Trafficking PEDs is a criminal offence with substantial penalties.
- Insurance and contractual consequences (loss of payouts, contractual termination clauses).
The anti-doping framework
WADA
The World Anti-Doping Agency, established 1999. Issues the World Anti-Doping Code, the Prohibited List (updated annually), the Therapeutic Use Exemption framework, and accreditation standards for testing labs.
The Code applies across Olympic and most major sports through a network of national anti-doping organisations.
Sport Integrity Australia (SIA)
Established 2020 by merging ASADA (the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority), the National Integrity of Sport Unit, and Sport Integrity Hotline. SIA covers anti-doping, match-fixing, sport-related corruption, and athlete welfare.
SIA conducts testing (in-competition, out-of-competition, intelligence-led, target-based), runs education programs, and prosecutes anti-doping rule violations.
Testing
Athletes can be tested:
- At competitions.
- During training.
- At home or away from sport, at any time (out-of-competition testing).
- Through urine, blood, or both.
- For specific substances or through the Athlete Biological Passport (longitudinal biomarker profile).
Elite athletes provide whereabouts information so they can be located for unannounced testing.
Education
Sport Integrity Australia, AIS, and most major sports run mandatory anti-doping education for athletes, coaches, and support staff. School and junior athletes are increasingly targeted as PED awareness rises.
Sanctions
Standard ban for an Anti-Doping Rule Violation is 4 years for intentional violations. Lesser violations (negligence, contamination, specific substances) attract shorter bans. Second violations are typically lifetime.
How this dot point applies in HSC responses
A typical question is "Evaluate the effectiveness of anti-doping in elite sport" or "Discuss the ethical issues raised by PEDs in Australian sport". Strong responses:
- Name specific drug categories with examples.
- Cite specific cases (Lance Armstrong, Essendon, Shayna Jack 2019, recent Russian state doping).
- Cover the anti-doping framework (WADA, SIA, the Code, testing, sanctions).
- Make an explicit judgment on effectiveness with reasoning.
- Recognise the ethical complexity (athlete autonomy, competitive pressure, what counts as "fair").
Past exam questions, worked
Real questions from past NESA papers on this dot point, with our answer explainer.
2024 HSC6 marksEvaluate the effectiveness of anti-doping measures in addressing the use of performance-enhancing drugs in Australian sport.Show worked answer →
A 6-mark evaluate response needs the framework explained and an explicit judgment.
The framework. Sport Integrity Australia (SIA, established 2020 from ASADA) is the national anti-doping authority, operating under the WADA Code. Athletes face in- and out-of-competition testing, education programs, and sanctions for breaches.
What is working.
- The Athlete Biological Passport tracks biomarkers over time and has detected cases in cycling, athletics and swimming that single-test approaches would miss.
- The WADA Code harmonises sanctions across countries and sports. 4-year bans are a substantial deterrent.
- Education programs reach athletes from junior age.
- High-profile cases (Lance Armstrong, Russian state doping) show the framework can catch sophisticated programs.
What is not working.
- Detection lag - new drugs are detectable only after years of use.
- State-sponsored doping (Russia) revealed limits when doping has institutional backing.
- Recreational doping outside elite sport sits largely outside the framework.
- Testing cost limits coverage.
- Therapeutic Use Exemptions remain contested.
Judgment. Partially effective. It has caught significant cases and deterred substantial doping but has not eliminated drug use in elite sport. The framework is improving (the ABP is one example), but the cat-and-mouse dynamic with new substances continues.
Markers reward (1) framework explained, (2) effectiveness/limitation examples, (3) explicit judgment, (4) recognition that "effective" is relative.