Skip to main content
NSWAncient HistorySyllabus dot point

How was the Persian invasion finally defeated in 479 BC, and what were the reasons for the Greek victory?

The campaigns of 479 BC at Plataea and Mycale, the role of Pausanias, the end of the Persian invasion, the reasons for the Greek victory, and the immediate consequences for Greek leadership

A focused answer to the HSC Ancient History dot point on the final defeat of the Persian invasion in 479 BC. The Battle of Plataea under Pausanias, the simultaneous victory at Mycale, the reasons for the Greek victory (hoplite warfare, Greek unity, Persian limitations, Themistocles and Pausanias), and the immediate consequences.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.87 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. How to read a source on this topic

What this dot point is asking

NESA expects you to describe the final phase of the Persian invasion in 479 BC, the Battles of Plataea and Mycale, the role of Pausanias and other commanders, the reasons for the Greek victory across both Marathon and the second invasion, and the immediate consequences for Greek politics.

The answer

The winter of 480 to 479 BC

After Salamis (late September 480 BC) Xerxes returned to Asia with the main army. Mardonius wintered in Thessaly with around 50,000 picked troops including Persian cavalry and the Immortals. He attempted to detach Athens from the alliance, offering autonomy and Persian support; the Athenian Assembly, in a famous reply preserved by Herodotus (8.143), refused while one Athenian survived. Athens was evacuated a second time in summer 479 BC when Mardonius marched south.

The Battle of Plataea (August 479 BC)

The Hellenic League army, the largest ever assembled by Greeks (Herodotus 9.28 to 30 gives around 110,000 including light troops and helots; 38,700 hoplites), gathered in southern Boeotia under Pausanias, Spartan regent for the young king Pleistarchus.

Pausanias
Nephew of Leonidas, regent for Pleistarchus son of Leonidas. Spartan commander-in-chief.
Aristides
Athenian commander, around 8,000 Athenian hoplites.
The position
Both armies camped on the slopes of Mount Cithaeron, watching each other across the Asopus river. The position favoured the Greeks (hilly ground); Mardonius could not deploy his cavalry to full effect. The deadlock lasted around 10 days.
Persian harassment
Mardonius's cavalry attacked Greek water supplies and supply lines. The Greek commander Megistias of Sparta and the cavalry commander Masistius were killed. The Athenians killed Masistius in a cavalry skirmish; the body became a Greek trophy.
The night march
Pausanias ordered a redeployment to a position with better water. The night march went badly: contingents lost contact in the dark.
The battle
At dawn Mardonius, thinking the Greeks were in flight, ordered a general attack. The Persians and the medising Boeotians crossed the river. The Spartans and Tegeans (Pausanias's wing) held against the Persian and Bactrian infantry. The Athenians and Plataeans (other wing) engaged the Thebans. The Persian formation, lighter and lacking the hoplite shield wall, was broken at close quarters. Mardonius was killed; his army broke. Artabazus, second in command, withdrew 40,000 troops north before they engaged.
The Persian camp
Stormed by the Athenians. Vast plunder including Mardonius's tent (later set up by Pausanias to display the difference between Persian luxury and Spartan simplicity).
The reckoning
Persian land power in Greece ended at Plataea. The medising Greek states were dealt with: Thebes was punished; its pro-Persian leaders were executed; Thessaly lost prestige.

The Battle of Mycale (August 479 BC)

The Hellenic League fleet, around 110 ships under the Spartan king Leotychidas and the Athenian Xanthippus (father of Pericles), crossed the Aegean and engaged the Persian fleet at Mycale on the Ionian coast.

The Persian disposition
The Persian fleet, demoralised after Salamis and undermanned, beached its ships at Mycale near Samos and built a stockade.
The battle
Greek hoplites landed and assaulted the stockade. The Ionian Greek contingent in the Persian force defected. The Persians were defeated; the ships were burned. The traditional account (Herodotus 9.100) places Mycale on the same day as Plataea (27 August 479 BC).
Significance
Mycale ended Persian naval power in the Aegean and triggered the revolt of the Ionian cities against Persia.

The siege of Sestos (winter 479 to 478 BC)

After Mycale the Athenian contingent under Xanthippus crossed to the Thracian Chersonese and besieged Sestos, the Persian-held base controlling the Hellespont. After a winter siege Sestos fell. The Athenians captured the Persian commander Artayctes and crucified him for sacrilege (Herodotus 9.118 to 121). The capture of Sestos completes Herodotus's narrative.

Reasons for the Greek victory

Hoplite warfare
The Greek heavy infantry in close formation, with bronze armour, the long thrusting doru spear, and the hoplon shield, outclassed Persian light infantry in close combat. The phalanx broke Persian formations at Marathon, Thermopylae (until outflanked), and Plataea.
Naval policy
Themistocles's fleet (200 triremes built from 483/2 BC) made Salamis and Mycale possible.
Greek unity through the Hellenic League
The League formed at the Isthmus in autumn 481 BC bound the major states together for the duration of the crisis. Sparta took the overall command. Athens ceded naval leadership. The Serpent Column at Delphi commemorates the 31 League states.
Leadership
Themistocles at Salamis, Pausanias at Plataea, Leotychidas and Xanthippus at Mycale, Leonidas at Thermopylae, Miltiades at Marathon. Persian leadership was uneven: Mardonius at Plataea fought hard but lacked Xerxes's authority; Datis and Artaphernes had been defeated at Marathon.
Geography
Mountainous Greece favoured the defender. Narrow passes (Thermopylae) and narrow straits (Salamis) neutralised Persian numerical superiority. Long supply lines from the Hellespont strained Persia.
Religion and morale
Greek belief in the favour of Delphi and Olympia; the moral force of resisting "barbarian" submission; the contrast between free citizen-soldiers and conscripted subjects of a king.
Persian limitations
A combined-arms force operating 1,500 km from the Hellespont. Logistical strain. The need to divide between army and fleet at Salamis. The personal withdrawal of Xerxes after Salamis. The inability of the medising allies to deliver a decisive contribution.

The immediate consequences

End of the invasion
Persia would not attempt another major invasion of Greece. Persian and Greek wars continued (Ionian campaigns, the Peace of Callias around 449 BC) but the strategic threat had ended.
Greek confidence
The wars produced an enduring "Greek versus barbarian" ideology (Aeschylus's Persians, Herodotus's Histories) and a panhellenic dedication at Delphi.
The rise of Athens
Athens emerged with a fleet, a damaged city, and a network of grateful Ionian allies. The Delian League followed within a year.
The position of Sparta
Pausanias and Leotychidas led the Hellenic League into the Aegean in 478 BC but their conduct (Pausanias's arrogance at Byzantium; Leotychidas's bribery in Thessaly) discredited Spartan leadership outside the Peloponnese. Sparta withdrew, ceding the eastern Aegean to Athens.

The sources

Herodotus, Histories 9
The major source for Plataea, Mycale, and Sestos.
Thucydides, Pentecontaetia (Histories 1.89 to 117)
Covers the aftermath: the rebuilding of Athens's walls, the formation of the Delian League, the recall of Pausanias.
Plutarch, Aristides and Cimon
Later but draws on lost authors.
Diodorus Siculus 11
A first-century BC summary, less reliable.
Archaeology
The Serpent Column at Delphi (dedicated by the 31 League states from Persian spoils, now in Istanbul); the Plataean ossuary; the trophy at Mycale.

How to read a source on this topic

Section IV sources on the final victory typically include extracts from Herodotus 9, Aeschylus, or the Serpent Column inscription. Three reading habits.

First, take the unity argument seriously but not exclusively. The Hellenic League is real; it is also fragile (the Peloponnesian commanders at Salamis nearly withdrew).

Second, watch the medising states. Greek victory is also a story of which Greeks did not join: Thebes, most of Boeotia, Thessaly, Argos. The narrative of "Greek freedom" exaggerates the share that fought.

Third, integrate Plataea and Mycale. They are paired victories; together they end Persian power on both sides of the Aegean.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

2021 HSC (style)20 marksTo what extent was Greek unity responsible for the defeat of the Persian invasion of 480 to 479 BC?
Show worked answer →

A 25-mark essay needs thesis, multiple causes, counter-argument, and historiography.

Thesis
Greek unity (the Hellenic League) was necessary but not sufficient. Victory rested on hoplite warfare, naval policy, leadership, geography, and Persian limitations.
Greek unity
The Hellenic League formed at the Isthmus in autumn 481 BC. Thirty-one states joined; medising states did not. Sparta took overall command; Athens ceded naval leadership to Eurybiades. The Serpent Column at Delphi commemorates the 31 League states.
Hoplite warfare
Bronze armour, hoplon shield, long thrusting spear, and the phalanx outclassed Persian light infantry. Marathon and Plataea were close-quarters hoplite victories.
Naval policy
Themistocles built 200 triremes from the Laurion silver windfall (483/2 BC). Without the fleet there is no Salamis or Mycale.
Leadership
Themistocles at Salamis; Pausanias at Plataea; Cimon and Aristides. Persian leadership was uneven.
Geography
Narrow passes (Thermopylae), narrow straits (Salamis), and the difficulty of supplying a vast army favoured the defenders.
Persian limitations
A combined-arms force far from base; logistical strain.
Counter-argument
Unity was fragile. The League nearly broke before Salamis. After Plataea Sparta and Athens separated within five years.
Historiography
Herodotus treats unity as the moral lesson. Cawkwell (The Greek Wars, 2005) stresses Persian limitations. Holland (Persian Fire, 2005) emphasises ideology. Cartledge (After Thermopylae, 2013) re-centres Plataea.
Conclusion
Unity was necessary but acted with hoplite quality, naval policy, leadership, and Persian limitations.
Practice (NESA)7 marksDescribe the Battle of Plataea (479 BC).
Show worked answer →

A 7-mark "describe" needs forces, course, and outcome.

The forces
Around 40,000 Greek hoplites under Pausanias (regent for the young king Pleistarchus) including 5,000 Spartiates, 35,000 helots (light troops), and the Athenians under Aristides. Around 70,000 Persians and 50,000 medising Greeks (Thebans, Boeotians) under Mardonius.
The position
Both armies camped on the slopes of Mount Cithaeron in southern Boeotia for 10 days, watching each other across the Asopus river. Persian cavalry harassed Greek supply lines.
The withdrawal and engagement
Greek movement to a new water source went wrong in the night; the formation broke up. Mardonius attacked at dawn, thinking the Greeks were in flight. The Spartans and Tegeans held off the Persian and Bactrian infantry; the Athenians repulsed the Theban contingent. Mardonius was killed; his army broke.
The Persian camp
Stormed by the Athenians; vast plunder (Herodotus 9.80 to 83). 40,000 Persians under Artabazus escaped north; the rest were destroyed.
Outcome
Persian land power in Greece ended. Boeotia was punished; the Theban leadership was executed. The Serpent Column at Delphi was dedicated.

Markers reward forces, the manoeuvring phase, the engagement, and the outcome.

Related dot points