Art history practice: HSC Visual Arts core concept
“Art history practice: the practice of historians, including the writing of art history, the construction of canons, the use of archives, and the situating of artworks within periods, movements, and cultures”
Art history practice is the sustained activity of historians situating artworks within temporal, stylistic, cultural, and institutional contexts. It produces textbooks, monographs, catalogues raisonnes, and historical exhibitions. Named historians for HSC reference include Bernard Smith, Sasha Grishin, E.H. Gombrich, Linda Nochlin, Griselda Pollock, and Howard Morphy. The canon is constructed and contested; feminist and postcolonial historians have expanded it. Markers reward named historians, dated publications, and explicit reference to the contexts historians work with.
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
NESA expects you to define art history practice, distinguish it from artmaking and criticism, identify its outputs, explain how historians construct contexts and canons, and refer to named historians. Art history practice is one of the three practices in the Visual Arts Stage 6 syllabus.
The answer
What is art history practice
Art history practice is the sustained activity of historians situating artworks within temporal, stylistic, cultural, and institutional contexts. Historians ask when an artwork was made, what movement or period it belongs to, what cultural and political circumstances shaped it, and how it has been received over time.
History produces texts and exhibitions: textbook surveys (Gombrich's The Story of Art, 1950), scholarly monographs on individual artists or movements, catalogues raisonnes (the definitive catalogue of all known works by an artist), and historical exhibitions in museums and galleries (the AGNSW's permanent display of Australian art is an art-historical argument made through curation).
The dimensions of art history practice
- Temporal context
- Historians fix the dates of artworks, periods, and movements. Cubism is conventionally dated 1907 (Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon) to 1914 (the outbreak of WWI). The Impressionist movement is dated 1860s-1880s, beginning loosely with Manet's Le Dejeuner sur l'herbe (1863). Dates are not natural facts; they are historical arguments.
- Stylistic and movement context
- Historians group artworks by shared formal features, intentions, and contexts to form movements. Movements provide audiences with a navigable map of art history. But the construction of a movement is interpretive: Pop Art lumps together Warhol, Lichtenstein, Hamilton, and Hockney despite significant differences.
- Cultural context
- Historians read artworks against the religious, political, economic, and social systems in which they were made. Albert Namatjira's watercolours of the Western Aranda landscape cannot be understood without the Hermannsburg mission, the assimilation policy, and the broader history of Indigenous Australia.
- Institutional context
- Historians also write the history of galleries, art schools, markets, and audiences. The shift of artistic centre from Paris to New York around 1945 is institutional history as much as stylistic history.
- Reception history
- How an artwork has been received and reinterpreted over time is itself art-historical material. Van Gogh sold one painting in his lifetime; his posthumous canonisation is reception history.
Named historians for HSC case studies
- Bernard Smith (1916-2011)
- Australian art historian, author of European Vision and the South Pacific (1960) and Australian Painting 1788-1960 (1962, with later editions). Often called the founder of Australian art history.
- Sasha Grishin (born 1955)
- Australian art historian, author of Australian Art: A History (2013) and many monographs on Australian artists. Emeritus Professor of Art History at the Australian National University.
- E.H. Gombrich (1909-2001)
- Austrian-British art historian, author of The Story of Art (1950, sixteenth edition 1995), the bestselling survey of Western art ever published. His Art and Illusion (1960) examined the psychology of representation.
- Linda Nochlin (1931-2017)
- American feminist art historian, author of "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?" (1971), which transformed the discipline by showing how institutional exclusion produced an apparently male canon.
- Griselda Pollock (born 1949)
- British feminist art historian, author of Vision and Difference (1988), which brought feminist and psychoanalytic theory into mainstream art history.
- Howard Morphy (born 1947)
- British-Australian anthropologist and art historian, author of Aboriginal Art (1998), foundational for the study of Indigenous Australian art in academic art history.
How historians construct the canon
The canon is the set of artists and artworks treated as historically significant. Canons are constructed through repeated inclusion in textbooks, museum collections, monographs, and university curricula. They are not fixed: feminist art historians (Nochlin, Pollock) have expanded the canon to include women artists previously excluded, and postcolonial art historians (Morphy, Smith) have integrated non-Western and Indigenous artists into narratives once dominated by Western Europe and the USA.
The HSC syllabus encourages students to interrogate the canon: who is included, who is excluded, and on what grounds.
- Treating art history as a neutral record
- History is constructed. The canon reflects institutional choices, not natural significance.
- Collapsing history into chronology
- History situates artworks in context; chronology just dates them. Historians do more than list dates.
- Forgetting non-Western and Indigenous histories
- Western European and American art dominates many textbooks. Australian Indigenous art is older than the European canon by tens of thousands of years and is now central to Australian art history.
- Confusing history with criticism
- Criticism judges contemporary work; history situates work in longer narratives. Sometimes the same writer does both, but the activities are distinct.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
Practice (NESA)8 marksExplain how art historians situate artworks within broader contexts. Refer to one or more named historians in your answer.Show worked answer →
An 8-mark explain needs the contexts historians work with, a named historian, and applied examples.
- Thesis
- Art history practice situates artworks in temporal, stylistic, cultural, and institutional contexts, producing canons, movements, and narratives that shape how audiences encounter art.
- Temporal context
- Historians date artworks and locate them in periods. Bernard Smith's European Vision and the South Pacific (1960) traces how European artists from Cook's voyages onwards represented the Pacific, mapping the visual tradition across nearly two centuries.
- Stylistic and movement context
- Historians group artworks into movements (Impressionism 1860s-1880s, Cubism 1907-1914, Pop Art 1950s-1970s). Movements are historical constructs, not natural categories. E.H. Gombrich's The Story of Art (1950, sixteenth edition 1995) constructs a canon of Western art from prehistory to the twentieth century around the development of representation.
- Cultural context
- Historians situate artworks within cultural systems. Sasha Grishin's Australian Art: A History (2013) reads Australian art across colonial, federation, modernist, and contemporary periods, integrating Indigenous and non-Indigenous traditions.
- Institutional context
- Historians also write the history of galleries, markets, and audiences. The history of the Art Gallery of New South Wales (founded 1871) is itself an art-historical subject; the institution shapes what art is collected, exhibited, and remembered.
- Conclusion
- Art history is not neutral. The canon is constructed; historians make choices about what to include, exclude, and emphasise. Feminist and postcolonial art historians (Linda Nochlin, Griselda Pollock) have shown how the canon has historically excluded women and non-Western artists. Markers reward named historians, dated publications, and explicit reference to contexts.
Practice (NESA)5 marksDefine art history practice and distinguish it from art criticism practice.Show worked answer →
A 5-mark define needs a precise definition plus the distinction.
- Definition of art history practice
- Art history practice is the sustained activity of historians situating artworks within temporal, stylistic, cultural, and institutional contexts. It produces art-historical textbooks, scholarly monographs, catalogues raisonnes (complete catalogues of an artist's work), and historical exhibitions in museums.
- Distinction from art criticism
- Art criticism is contemporaneous interpretation and judgement of new or recent artworks; art history is retrospective situating of artworks within longer historical narratives. A critic reviews an exhibition that opened last week; a historian writes about Caravaggio four hundred years after his death. The two often overlap; many critics also write history, and many historians review contemporary work.
- Applied example
- Bernard Smith's Australian Painting 1788-1990 (1962, fourth edition 1991 with Terry Smith and Christopher Heathcote) is a canonical work of art history; it constructs a narrative of Australian painting across two centuries. By contrast, John McDonald's weekly review of a current Sydney exhibition in The Sydney Morning Herald is art criticism. The same Margaret Olley painting might appear in both, treated very differently: as one work in a long Australian still life tradition (history), or as a recent acquisition by the AGNSW worth seeing (criticism).
Markers reward the definition, the distinction, and named applied examples.