Skip to main content

Women in Australian sport: HSC PDHPE Option

Syllabus dot point

“The participation of women in Australian sport: historical patterns and changes, media coverage and visibility, pay equity, governance representation, the rise of women's elite leagues”

6 min read

Quick answer

Professional women's leagues exploded in five years (WBBL 2015, AFLW 2017, NRLW 2018) and the 2023 Matildas World Cup drew 70,000+ crowds, but pay, board seats and routine media coverage still trail the men's codes.

Jump to a section
  1. The historical pattern
  2. The professional leagues
  3. Pay equity
  4. Media coverage
  5. Governance and coaching
  6. Issues still on the table
  7. How this dot point applies
  8. Exam-style questions

Legacy syllabus. This page covers the former PDHPE Stage 6 syllabus (listed by NESA as PDHPE Stage 6 (2012)). The last PDHPE HSC exam was held in 2025. From the 2026 HSC, students sit Health and Movement Science 11-12 (2023) instead: see our HSC Health and Movement Science hub. Use this page only as background or for older revision material.

Women's sport in Australia has changed more in the last decade than in the previous fifty years. The AFLW launched in 2017, the WBBL preceded it in 2015, the NRLW followed shortly after, and the Matildas hosting the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup produced a generational moment for Australian women's sport. This dot point covers the historical pattern, the recent changes, and what remains unequal.

The historical pattern

Australian women's sport has a long history that is more substantial than the standard narrative ("women's sport started with AFLW") allows.

Early-1900s pioneers
Women's swimming, surf life saving, tennis, and athletics had Australian champions from the early decades of the century. Fanny Durack won the first women's Olympic swimming gold in 1912 (the first year women's swimming was included).
Mid-20th century
Women's sport existed but was treated as marginal. Media coverage was negligible, pay was nonexistent (the sports were amateur), and many sports actively excluded women from elite competition.
The 1970s-1990s
Women's sport grew slowly. The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 progressively removed formal exclusion. Women's hockey, netball, cricket, and basketball developed strong competitive structures.
Cathy Freeman, Sydney 2000
The 400m gold medal and the Olympic flame lighting were a moment of national symbolic significance. Freeman's career was part of a broader shift in the visibility and prestige of Australian women athletes.
The 2010s-2020s explosion
The launch of professional women's leagues across multiple codes within a five-year period reshaped the landscape.

The professional leagues

  • WBBL (Women's Big Bash League). Cricket Australia, launched 2015. Standalone tournament with substantial domestic broadcast deal. The most-developed women's professional competition in Australian sport on most metrics.
  • AFLW (AFL Women's). Launched 2017 with 8 teams, now 18 teams aligned with the AFL men's clubs. Salaries have grown from sub-amateur to part-time professional.
  • NRLW (National Rugby League Women's). Launched 2018, expanded to a full home-and-away competition from 2023. Some players are now full-time professionals.
  • Super W. Rugby Australia's women's competition, launched 2018.
  • A-League Women. Football Australia's national women's competition, predecessor (W-League) launched 2008.
  • Suncorp Super Netball. Australia's elite netball league. Pre-dates most of the others.

Pay equity

Pay gaps in Australian elite sport remain substantial.

  • The AFL minimum male salary is around $90,000+ (rookie list); the AFLW minimum is around $50,000-$60,000 (full-season contract, 2024 figures).
  • The Matildas and Socceroos achieved nominal pay parity in 2019 through the collective agreement with Football Australia. Earnings still differ because international prize money and sponsorship pools differ.
  • Cricket Australia has reduced but not eliminated gaps in domestic contracts.

The standard arguments cycle each negotiation: revenue, broadcast deals, and crowd numbers do differ. Counterarguments: the women's competitions are still in build phase, structural underinvestment caused the revenue gap, and revenue follows visibility rather than the other way around. Both arguments are partly correct.

Media coverage

Women's sport media coverage has grown substantially but remains under-represented relative to participation.

  • Television. Most major women's leagues now have free-to-air broadcast deals (AFLW on Seven, NRLW on Nine, WBBL on Foxtel and Seven).
  • Print and online. Coverage has expanded across mainstream outlets. The Guardian, The Age, SMH, ABC, and SBS all maintain dedicated women's sport coverage.
  • Crowds and ratings. The 2023 Women's World Cup matches in Australia drew crowds of 70,000+ and broke broadcast ratings records. The AFLW grand final has drawn 50,000+ crowds.

The remaining gap is in routine coverage of regular-season competition rather than marquee events.

Governance and coaching

Boards, executive teams, and head coaching ranks in Australian sport remain disproportionately male.

  • AFL. Around 30-40% of board roles are held by women (improving since 2018).
  • NRL. Similar trajectory, slower starting point.
  • Cricket Australia. Around 40% female board representation, established earlier than other codes.
  • Head coaching of elite women's teams is still skewed male in some codes despite a growing pool of female coaches.

Sport Australia's Women in Sport governance targets and the Office for Women in Sport push the agenda. Progress has been measurable but slow.

Issues still on the table

  • Pregnancy and parenthood policies. AFLW and other codes have rolled out parental leave and return-to-play protocols. Implementation varies.
  • Period products and facilities. Major Australian sporting venues have varying provision. Some sports have introduced period leave or training adjustments.
  • Trans and intersex athletes. Australian sport governing bodies have moved through several iterations of policy. Approaches vary between codes.
  • LGBTIQ+ inclusion. Pride rounds and inclusion programs have become routine in major codes; the lived experience for individual athletes varies.
  • Safety and harassment. The Royal Commission into child sexual abuse and ongoing cases have surfaced safeguarding issues in women's sport as in men's.
Worked example: evaluating gender equity across four dimensions

A strong evaluate answer assesses each dimension separately, then reaches a single directional verdict.

Step 1: Participation and visibility

Major gains: WBBL (2015), AFLW (2017), NRLW (2018) and the 2023 Matildas World Cup with crowds of 70,000+.

Step 2: Pay

Gaps persist (AFLW minimums sit well below AFL men's), though the Matildas reached nominal parity in 2019; weigh the build-phase argument against structural underinvestment.

Step 3: Media and governance

Marquee coverage is strong but routine regular-season coverage trails; board representation is rising while head coaching still skews male.

Step 4: Reach a directional judgement

Conclude with a clear verdict on the direction of travel (substantial, accelerating progress with real remaining gaps), supported by the figures above.

Ending on "more needs to be done"

A frequent error is a balanced description that finishes with a non-conclusion like "more needs to be done". Evaluate questions demand a judgement: state whether progress has been substantial and where it is heading, backed by specific data (league launch dates, salary figures, governance percentages). A vague sign-off caps the marks even when the body is strong.

How this dot point applies

A typical HSC extended response asks about gender equity in Australian sport. Strong responses:

  1. Cite specific data (salary figures, league launch dates, governance percentages).
  2. Name specific leagues and athletes (AFLW, WBBL, NRLW, Matildas, named pioneers).
  3. Distinguish elite from grassroots (participation patterns are gendered too).
  4. Address both progress (substantial since 2015) and remaining gaps (pay, governance, routine media coverage).
  5. Make an explicit judgment on the direction of travel rather than a balanced "more needs to be done" non-conclusion.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

HSC 2020-style5 marks
Describe the changes in women's participation in Australian elite sport over the past decade, and outline ONE area of ongoing inequity.
Show worked answer →

A 5-mark response needs the recent changes plus one persisting gap.

Changes. Professional women's leagues launched in quick succession (WBBL 2015, AFLW 2017, NRLW 2018), and the 2023 Matildas home World Cup drew crowds of 70,000+ and record ratings, lifting visibility and broadcast deals.

Ongoing inequity. Pay (AFLW minimums well below AFL men's), governance (boards and head-coaching ranks still skew male), or routine media coverage of regular-season games. Choose one and state the gap.

Markers reward (1) specific dated changes, (2) a clearly identified inequity with evidence, (3) accuracy over generalisation.

HSC 2022-style8 marks
Evaluate the progress towards gender equity in Australian sport, considering participation, pay, media and governance.
Show worked answer →

An 8-mark evaluate needs each dimension assessed and a directional judgement.

Participation and visibility
Major gains since 2015; women's leagues now have free-to-air deals and marquee events draw large crowds.
Pay
Gaps persist (AFLW minimums below AFL men's), though the Matildas reached nominal parity in 2019; build-phase versus structural-underinvestment arguments both apply.
Media and governance
Marquee coverage is strong but routine regular-season coverage lags; board representation is rising (around 3030 to 40%40\% in some codes) but head coaching still skews male.
Judgement
Conclude with a clear direction-of-travel verdict (substantial progress, real remaining gaps) rather than a vague "more needs to be done"; markers reward specific figures and dates.

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained