Topic 4: Human Resource Management

NSWBusiness StudiesSyllabus dot point

How are rewards and workplace disputes managed?

Strategies - leadership style, job design, recruitment, training and development, performance management, rewards - monetary and non-monetary, individual or group, performance-based; global - the costs, skills and supply of labour; workplace disputes - resolution of disputes through negotiation, mediation, grievance procedures, involvement of courts and tribunals

A focused answer to the HSC Business Studies dot point on HRM strategies for rewards and workplace dispute resolution. Monetary and non-monetary rewards, individual vs group performance-based pay, the dispute-resolution ladder (negotiation, mediation, grievance, Fair Work Commission, courts) and global HR strategy, with worked examples from BHP, Coles and the SDA.

Generated by Claude OpusReviewed by Better Tuition Academy9 min answer

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

What this dot point is asking

NESA wants you to know the HRM strategies a business chooses (leadership style, job design, recruitment approach, training, performance management, rewards), how rewards are structured (monetary and non-monetary, individual or group, performance-based), the global dimensions of HR strategy, and the Australian dispute-resolution framework from negotiation through to the courts. Section IV extended responses on HRM commonly ask you to evaluate a business's reward strategy or its dispute-resolution approach.

The answer

HRM strategies

The syllabus names a set of strategies a business deploys across the HR function.

Leadership style
Autocratic, persuasive, consultative or participative. Different styles fit different contexts - autocratic suits emergency or compliance-critical environments; participative suits knowledge-work and creative environments.
Job design
General or specific tasks; job enlargement (more breadth); job enrichment (more depth and autonomy); cross-functional teams. Well-designed jobs match the worker's capability and motivation to the business need.
Recruitment strategy
Internal v external; targeted talent pools; employer branding; diversity-targeted recruitment. Discussed in detail in HR processes.
Training and development
Current-skill training v future-skill investment. Continuous-learning culture v role-specific training. Modes covered in HR processes.
Performance management
Developmental v administrative; annual v continuous; objective-based v competency-based; 360-feedback. The trend is toward continuous, OKR-based, and outcome-focused systems.
Rewards
Covered in depth below.
Global HR strategy
Sourcing skills internationally, managing expatriate assignments, and aligning HR policies across countries.

Rewards

Monetary rewards

Direct cash and cash-equivalent payments.

  • Base salary. The fixed annual or hourly pay.
  • Performance bonuses. Variable pay tied to individual, team or business performance.
  • Commission. Pay tied to sales volume or revenue - common in real estate (Ray White, Belle Property), financial advice and B2B sales.
  • Profit-sharing. Distribution of a share of business profit to employees - common in some Australian co-operatives and partnership models.
  • Allowances. Specific payments for specific costs (tool allowance, vehicle allowance, working-from-home allowance).
  • Share-based remuneration. Employee share plans, performance rights, options. Atlassian, Macquarie and most ASX-listed businesses use share-based incentives for senior staff.
  • Superannuation. Statutory minimum 12 percent from July 2025 (post the 2024 increase schedule). Above-minimum super is a real benefit.

Non-monetary rewards

Everything else.

  • Recognition. Formal awards (Employee of the Month, peer-nominated awards), informal recognition.
  • Career development. Promotion paths, secondments, training investment, mentoring.
  • Work-life balance. Hybrid and flexible work, additional annual leave, the right to disconnect (now a NES entitlement post the Closing Loopholes 2024 reform), purchased-leave schemes, sabbaticals.
  • Wellbeing. EAP access, mental-health-first-aid programs, wellbeing budgets, on-site gyms.
  • Workplace environment. Office quality, equipment, technology, social events.
  • Purpose and culture. Pledge 1 percent (Atlassian), Reconciliation Action Plans (BHP, Wesfarmers, Telstra), volunteering days.

Individual v group v performance-based

  • Individual rewards target individual performance. Strong incentive for individual effort; risk of unhealthy internal competition.
  • Group rewards target team or business-unit performance. Encourages collaboration; risk of free-riding.
  • Performance-based rewards (variable, conditional on hitting targets) at either level. Aligns pay with results; risks distorting behaviour if metrics are poorly chosen (the "Wells Fargo problem" - tellers opening fake accounts to hit sales targets).

Most modern Australian businesses use a mix. Senior executives at Coles, Woolworths and Macquarie are paid significant variable rewards (short-term cash bonus, long-term share-based incentive) tied to a balanced scorecard of financial, customer and risk metrics.

Global HR strategy

For Australian businesses operating internationally:

  • Costs of labour. Direct cost (salaries) and indirect cost (relocation, benefits, expatriate allowances). India and the Philippines have lower wage costs but rising rapidly; the US is significantly higher than Australia for tech roles.
  • Skills supply. Where the talent is. Atlassian's Bengaluru engineering hub exists because of India's deep software-engineering talent pool. BHP's Houston petroleum office exists because of the deep oil-and-gas-engineering talent in Texas.
  • Cultural and regulatory differences. Local employment law, union landscape and cultural norms must be respected.

Workplace dispute resolution

The Australian system is a ladder from direct discussion to formal litigation.

1. Negotiation
Direct discussion between the parties. Fastest, cheapest, lowest-stakes.
2. Internal grievance procedures
Most Australian businesses have a formal grievance procedure - the employee escalates the issue through their manager, then HR, then a senior leader. Provides documented evidence and a structured pathway.
3. Mediation
Neutral third party facilitates discussion without making a binding decision. Useful when direct negotiation stalls.
4. The Fair Work Commission
Australia's national workplace relations tribunal. Handles:
  • Unfair-dismissal applications (lodged within 21 days of dismissal).
  • General Protections applications (adverse action for a protected reason).
  • Enterprise-bargaining facilitation and approval.
  • Industrial action applications (protected action ballots).
  • Award reviews.

5. The Federal Court. Hears appeals from the FWC and significant employment cases. The 2023 Qantas baggage-handler outsourcing case (Federal Court found unlawful outsourcing) went to the High Court, which upheld the original ruling in 2023.

6. The High Court. Final appeal court; hears matters of constitutional or major legal significance.

Worked Australian examples

BHP BMA enterprise-agreement renegotiation (2023-2024)
Direct negotiation between BHP and the MEU; bargaining facilitation by the FWC; the new agreement passed the BOOT test and was approved. Negotiations covered base pay, rosters, and the use of labour-hire workers under the "same job same pay" reforms.
Coles Supermarkets retail enterprise agreement (multiple cycles)
Negotiated between Coles and the SDA (Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association). Covers around 100,000 retail and DC workers. Disputes have included contested clauses around penalty rates and casual conversion.
Qantas baggage-handler outsourcing
Negotiation, internal grievance, FWC application, Federal Court, High Court. The High Court's 2023 decision upheld that Qantas's 2020 outsourcing of 1,700 ground workers was unlawful because it was motivated by a desire to prevent future industrial action. Damages settlements reached approximately $120 million.

Past exam questions, worked

Real questions from past NESA papers on this dot point, with our answer explainer.

2021 HSC5 marksDistinguish between monetary and non-monetary rewards. Explain how a business uses a mix of both to motivate staff.
Show worked answer →

A 5-mark answer needs both reward categories, examples, and a worked business example.

Monetary rewards
Cash and cash-equivalent payments - base salary, performance bonuses, profit-sharing, commissions, allowances, share-based remuneration (options, performance rights, employee share scheme). Monetary rewards directly affect take-home pay.
Non-monetary rewards
Everything else - recognition, career development opportunities, flexible work, additional leave, health insurance subsidy, parental leave above the NES, learning budgets, wellbeing programs, EAP access, sabbaticals, formal recognition awards.
Why a mix matters
Pure monetary reward attracts and retains but does not always motivate - research consistently shows that beyond a sufficiency point, non-monetary factors (purpose, autonomy, mastery, recognition) drive engagement more than pay. A business that competes only on pay loses to competitors offering a stronger non-monetary package; a business that ignores pay loses to market-rate offers.
Worked example: Atlassian
Atlassian offers competitive Sydney and Bay Area base salaries (monetary), substantial equity grants (monetary, long-vesting), comprehensive private health cover (monetary-equivalent benefit), and a strong non-monetary package - hybrid work, a learning budget, paid volunteer time under Pledge 1 percent, generous parental leave, sabbatical for long-service employees. The combined package consistently ranks Atlassian among Australia's most attractive employers.

Markers reward (1) clear definition of both, (2) the contrast (what motivates v what attracts/retains), (3) a worked example showing both at play.

2023 HSC6 marksExplain the role of negotiation, mediation and the Fair Work Commission in resolving workplace disputes.
Show worked answer →

A 6-mark answer needs the three mechanisms, the escalation logic, and a worked example.

Negotiation
Direct discussion between the disputing parties (employer and employee, or employer and union) to reach a voluntary settlement. The fastest, cheapest, lowest-stakes mechanism. Used for most day-to-day disputes - rostering disputes, leave-application disputes, the early stages of an enterprise-agreement negotiation.
Mediation
A neutral third party (a workplace-relations consultant, an internal mediator, a specialist firm) facilitates the discussion without making a binding decision. Useful when direct negotiation has stalled. Confidential and non-binding; either party can walk away.
The Fair Work Commission
Australia's national workplace relations tribunal. Hears unfair-dismissal applications, General Protections applications, bargaining disputes (including enterprise-agreement deadlocks), and applications about industrial action. Decisions can be binding. Appeals from the FWC go to a Full Bench of the FWC or in some cases to the Federal Court.
Escalation logic
Disputes escalate through the ladder - direct discussion, internal grievance procedure, mediation, FWC, courts. Federal Court or High Court litigation is reserved for the most serious matters (the Qantas baggage-handler outsourcing case went to the High Court).
Worked example: BHP BMA 2023-2024
BHP and the Mining and Energy Union began with direct negotiation. When stalled, the parties accessed FWC bargaining facilitation. The union sought protected industrial action. Final negotiations brought a deal that passed the FWC's BOOT test and was approved. The escalation ran through negotiation, then FWC, without going to court.

Markers reward (1) all three mechanisms named and explained, (2) the escalation logic, (3) a worked example showing the ladder in action.

Related dot points